Nursing education perspectives · 2015
A Mixed-Methods, International, Multisite Study to Develop and Validate a Measure of Nurse-to-Physician Communication in Simulation.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Foronda Cynthia L, Alhusen Jeanne, Budhathoki Chakra, Lamb Mary, Tinsley Kim, MacWilliams Brent, Daniels Jessie, Baptiste Diana Lyn, Reese Kathie Kushto, Bauman Eric
Аннотация
AIM: This study examined the reliability and validity of the ISBAR Interprofessional Communication Rubric (IICR).
BACKGROUND: Improving education regarding communication in health care is a global priority. Communication is difficult to measure and no evaluation rubrics were located that uniquely focused on nurse-to-physician communication in simulation.
METHOD: This study used a mixed-methods design and included five sites.
RESULTS: The IICR was determined reliable among nurse educator raters (r = 0.79). The scale was found valid as assessed by nurse and physician experts (content validity index = 0.92). When describing their experience of using the tool, nurse educator raters described three categories: overall acceptability of the tool, ease of use, and perceptions of the importance of communication skills for patient safety.
CONCLUSION: Teaching and evaluating communication in simulation with a standardized rubric is a research area in need of further exploration and refinement.
BACKGROUND: Improving education regarding communication in health care is a global priority. Communication is difficult to measure and no evaluation rubrics were located that uniquely focused on nurse-to-physician communication in simulation.
METHOD: This study used a mixed-methods design and included five sites.
RESULTS: The IICR was determined reliable among nurse educator raters (r = 0.79). The scale was found valid as assessed by nurse and physician experts (content validity index = 0.92). When describing their experience of using the tool, nurse educator raters described three categories: overall acceptability of the tool, ease of use, and perceptions of the importance of communication skills for patient safety.
CONCLUSION: Teaching and evaluating communication in simulation with a standardized rubric is a research area in need of further exploration and refinement.