Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2015
Periorbital Lipogranuloma Following Facial Autologous Fat Injections: Non-surgical Treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Seo Ji Won, Sa Ho-Seok
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Periorbital lipogranuloma following autologous fat injection into the forehead for cosmetic facial augmentation is a recently described adverse outcome. Patients have typically been treated with surgical excision. This study evaluates the clinical characteristics of periorbital lipogranulomas, and the non-surgical treatment outcomes of these patients.
METHODS: This is a noncomparative, interventional case series. A retrospective analysis of clinical data and radiographic images was performed of patients with periorbital lipogranuloma following autologous fat injection. Objective treatment outcomes after intralesional triamcinolone injection and/or oral prednisolone were evaluated by measuring the size of the lipogranulomas pre- and post-treatment. Cosmetic outcomes were also assessed by the subjective satisfaction at the last visit.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified with periorbital lipogranuloma following facial autologous fat injection. All patients were female, the mean age was 40 ± 10 years, and 19 patients received cryopreserved fat. Twenty-one patients underwent non-surgical corticosteroid treatment. 'Resolution' was achieved in 15 patients (71%), and 'Partial Resolution' was achieved in 5 patients (24%). One patient (5%) who took oral prednisone alone showed 'No Response'. Cosmetic outcomes were classified as 'Very Satisfied' in 16 patients (76%), 'Satisfied' in 4 patients (19%), and 'Dissatisfied' in 1 patient (5%) after corticosteroid treatment.
CONCLUSION: Periorbital lipogranuloma following autologous fat injection may be diagnosed by history, physical exam, and orbital imaging. Non-surgical corticosteroid treatments showed a good response with few adverse effects and should be considered as a first line of treatment of periorbital granulomas prior to conducting surgical excision.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
METHODS: This is a noncomparative, interventional case series. A retrospective analysis of clinical data and radiographic images was performed of patients with periorbital lipogranuloma following autologous fat injection. Objective treatment outcomes after intralesional triamcinolone injection and/or oral prednisolone were evaluated by measuring the size of the lipogranulomas pre- and post-treatment. Cosmetic outcomes were also assessed by the subjective satisfaction at the last visit.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified with periorbital lipogranuloma following facial autologous fat injection. All patients were female, the mean age was 40 ± 10 years, and 19 patients received cryopreserved fat. Twenty-one patients underwent non-surgical corticosteroid treatment. 'Resolution' was achieved in 15 patients (71%), and 'Partial Resolution' was achieved in 5 patients (24%). One patient (5%) who took oral prednisone alone showed 'No Response'. Cosmetic outcomes were classified as 'Very Satisfied' in 16 patients (76%), 'Satisfied' in 4 patients (19%), and 'Dissatisfied' in 1 patient (5%) after corticosteroid treatment.
CONCLUSION: Periorbital lipogranuloma following autologous fat injection may be diagnosed by history, physical exam, and orbital imaging. Non-surgical corticosteroid treatments showed a good response with few adverse effects and should be considered as a first line of treatment of periorbital granulomas prior to conducting surgical excision.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.