European journal of gynaecological oncology · 2011
Second-line chemotherapy for carboplatin/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer: are multi-agent chemotherapies of little value truly?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ota T, Takeshima N, Takizawa K
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We examined whether second-line multi-agent chemotherapies are of any value for carboplatin/paclitaxel (TC)-refractory ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Subjects included 60 patients with ovarian, peritoneal, or tubal carcinoma who received second-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Thirty-nine were treated with irinotecan/cisplatin or nedaplatin and 21 with docetaxel/cisplatin shortly after TC failure. Patients were divided between those who were refractory to initial platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 29, Group A) and those who were platinum-sensitive (n = 31, Group B). Efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapies were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Response to the combination chemotherapy was 10.3% in Group A and 41.9% in Group B. Median time to disease progression was 4.02 months and 7.21 months, respectively (p = 0.006), and median survival time was 7.89 months and 9.23 months, respectively (p = 0.003). There was no difference in response between the two regimens. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities were more frequent with the docetaxel regimen.
CONCLUSION: The choice between agents for second-line chemotherapy for TC-refractory ovarian cancer should be based on whether the cancer was previously platinum-sensitive. With a history of such response, multi-agent chemotherapies are worth considering after TC failure. With no previous response, the expected efficacy of second-line multi-agent chemotherapy is low, suggesting the use of monochemotherapy.
METHODS: Subjects included 60 patients with ovarian, peritoneal, or tubal carcinoma who received second-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Thirty-nine were treated with irinotecan/cisplatin or nedaplatin and 21 with docetaxel/cisplatin shortly after TC failure. Patients were divided between those who were refractory to initial platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 29, Group A) and those who were platinum-sensitive (n = 31, Group B). Efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapies were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Response to the combination chemotherapy was 10.3% in Group A and 41.9% in Group B. Median time to disease progression was 4.02 months and 7.21 months, respectively (p = 0.006), and median survival time was 7.89 months and 9.23 months, respectively (p = 0.003). There was no difference in response between the two regimens. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities were more frequent with the docetaxel regimen.
CONCLUSION: The choice between agents for second-line chemotherapy for TC-refractory ovarian cancer should be based on whether the cancer was previously platinum-sensitive. With a history of such response, multi-agent chemotherapies are worth considering after TC failure. With no previous response, the expected efficacy of second-line multi-agent chemotherapy is low, suggesting the use of monochemotherapy.