International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2010
A pilot study evaluating a novel regimen comprised of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab for advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brown John V, Micha John P, Rettenmaier Mark A, Abaid Lisa N, Lopez Katrina L, Goldstein Bram H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity, progression-free survival, and response rate of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma patients treated with a novel regimen comprising paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab.
METHODS: All eligible patients were treated with intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15; carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on day 1; and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15; Q28 days for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab was administered during cycles 2 through 6.
RESULTS: Twenty patients received a combined total of 102 cycles of primary induction chemotherapy (median, 6; range, 2-6) and were evaluable for toxicity assessment. Six (5.9%) cycles were associated with grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, which resulted in the removal of 2 patients. Only 1 (0.98%) cycle was associated with grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Moreover, one patient developed a colorectal fistula and was subsequently removed from the study. Grade 3 hypertension was encountered and successfully managed in 3 participants. In the group of 13 patients who were evaluated for response, the overall response rate was 61.6% (30.8% complete response). Four patients exhibited stable disease, and 1 patient had progressive disease. The patient group's mean progression-free survival was 5.8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The tolerable hematologic toxicity and reasonable response rate after paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab suggest that this regimen has moderate activity and can be safely administered to an advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma population. We were further encouraged by the reasonable incidence of hypertension. However, because 4 patients were removed from the study because of either grade ≥ 2 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, we suggest that colony-stimulating factors and cautious patient observation should be considered with this regimen.
METHODS: All eligible patients were treated with intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15; carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on day 1; and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15; Q28 days for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab was administered during cycles 2 through 6.
RESULTS: Twenty patients received a combined total of 102 cycles of primary induction chemotherapy (median, 6; range, 2-6) and were evaluable for toxicity assessment. Six (5.9%) cycles were associated with grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, which resulted in the removal of 2 patients. Only 1 (0.98%) cycle was associated with grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Moreover, one patient developed a colorectal fistula and was subsequently removed from the study. Grade 3 hypertension was encountered and successfully managed in 3 participants. In the group of 13 patients who were evaluated for response, the overall response rate was 61.6% (30.8% complete response). Four patients exhibited stable disease, and 1 patient had progressive disease. The patient group's mean progression-free survival was 5.8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The tolerable hematologic toxicity and reasonable response rate after paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab suggest that this regimen has moderate activity and can be safely administered to an advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma population. We were further encouraged by the reasonable incidence of hypertension. However, because 4 patients were removed from the study because of either grade ≥ 2 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, we suggest that colony-stimulating factors and cautious patient observation should be considered with this regimen.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarboplatinCarcinoma, PapillaryCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelPeritoneal NeoplasmsPilot ProjectsSurvival RateTreatment Outcome