Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2006
Influence of the initial rectal distension on posterior margins in primary and postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pinkawa Michael, Siluschek Jaroslav, Gagel Bernd, Demirel Cengiz, Asadpour Branka, Holy Richard, Eble Michael J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to define the effect of different rectum fillings in the planning CT study on the posterior clinical target volume (CTV) displacements (PD) in primary and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent CT scans in supine position with a full bladder and an empty bladder before RT and at several points in time during the treatment. PD were determined depending on the initial rectum volume (RV), average cross-sectional rectal area (CSA), and the rectal diameter at the level of the bladder neck (RD).
RESULTS: Posterior CTV motion was not found to be minimal with a particularly small initial rectum filling. Steeply increasing PD resulted for patients with RV>120cm(3), CSA>12cm(2), and RD>4.5cm. While below these critical values a posterior margin of 6mm/9mm allowed to cover 80%/90% of displacements, 18mm/24mm were needed for patients with larger rectum fillings. No correlation of increasing rectum distension with increasing PD was found at the apex level. PD could not be reduced by voiding the bladder.
CONCLUSIONS: Defining the posterior margin in prostate RT, the initial rectum distension and the superior-inferior CTV level has to be considered. Patients with large initial rectum fillings have preferentially the need for repeated planning CT scans or image-guided RT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent CT scans in supine position with a full bladder and an empty bladder before RT and at several points in time during the treatment. PD were determined depending on the initial rectum volume (RV), average cross-sectional rectal area (CSA), and the rectal diameter at the level of the bladder neck (RD).
RESULTS: Posterior CTV motion was not found to be minimal with a particularly small initial rectum filling. Steeply increasing PD resulted for patients with RV>120cm(3), CSA>12cm(2), and RD>4.5cm. While below these critical values a posterior margin of 6mm/9mm allowed to cover 80%/90% of displacements, 18mm/24mm were needed for patients with larger rectum fillings. No correlation of increasing rectum distension with increasing PD was found at the apex level. PD could not be reduced by voiding the bladder.
CONCLUSIONS: Defining the posterior margin in prostate RT, the initial rectum distension and the superior-inferior CTV level has to be considered. Patients with large initial rectum fillings have preferentially the need for repeated planning CT scans or image-guided RT.