Journal of endourology · 2002
Shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones in patients with urinary diversion after radical cystectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deliveliotis Charalambos, Varkarakis John, Argiropoulos Vasilios, Protogerou Vassilios, Skolarikos Andreas, Albanis Stefanos, Constantine Dimopoulos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During recent years, survival of patients with invasive bladder cancer has been improved by early diagnosis and radical treatment. Urinary lithiasis is not rare in patients who have been submitted to radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. We have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of SWL for these patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 11 patients who presented to our lithotripsy department suffering from urinary lithiasis after radical cystectomy. They were all cancer free at the time of treatment, and all underwent SWL on the Dornier HM-3 lithotripter as a first-line treatment. The mean stone burden was 1.85 cm(2), and the stone-to-patient ratio was 1:1.
RESULTS: The stone-free rate 1 month after SWL was 63.7%. Patients who were not stone free underwent a second SWL, and the stone-free rate after the second SWL session was 81.8%. We performed percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in one patient after the second SWL session because of the large stone burden remaining (3.2 cm(2)). The remaining patient was submitted to ureterolithotomy.
CONCLUSION: Application of SWL gives very good results in the treatment of urinary lithiasis in patients with a urinary diversion. Indeed, the results are equivalent to those achieved in patients without urinary diversion.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 11 patients who presented to our lithotripsy department suffering from urinary lithiasis after radical cystectomy. They were all cancer free at the time of treatment, and all underwent SWL on the Dornier HM-3 lithotripter as a first-line treatment. The mean stone burden was 1.85 cm(2), and the stone-to-patient ratio was 1:1.
RESULTS: The stone-free rate 1 month after SWL was 63.7%. Patients who were not stone free underwent a second SWL, and the stone-free rate after the second SWL session was 81.8%. We performed percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in one patient after the second SWL session because of the large stone burden remaining (3.2 cm(2)). The remaining patient was submitted to ureterolithotomy.
CONCLUSION: Application of SWL gives very good results in the treatment of urinary lithiasis in patients with a urinary diversion. Indeed, the results are equivalent to those achieved in patients without urinary diversion.