Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] · 2006
[Prevention of incontinence after radical prostatectomy].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Ding-yi, Tang Qi, Wang Ming-wei, Liu Shi-xiong, Wang Jian, Zhou Yan-feng, Wu Yu-xuan, Zhou Wen-long, Zhu Yu, Zhang Chong-yu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the effect of urine control after radical retropubic prostatectomy by preserve the membranous part of sphincter urethrae and the neurovascular bundle, or to rebuild the bladder neck.
METHODS: The radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed on a total of 32 cases of prostate cancer. We preserve the membranous part of sphincter urethrae and the neurovascular bundle lateral to the prostate. We evaginate the posterior wall of the bladder adequately and make an additional folding stitch to rebuild the bladder neck.
RESULTS: The follow up is of 6-72 months. All patients could void without difficulty, no tumor recurrence and only 2 cases occurred slight incontinence. Other 30 cases regained the ability of controlling their urinations within 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy could be reduced by the method of preserving the membranous part of sphincter urethrae and preserving the neurovascular bundle lateral to the prostate in operation. It could also be avoided by evaginate the posterior wall of the bladder adequately and make an additional folding stitch to the bladder neck.
METHODS: The radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed on a total of 32 cases of prostate cancer. We preserve the membranous part of sphincter urethrae and the neurovascular bundle lateral to the prostate. We evaginate the posterior wall of the bladder adequately and make an additional folding stitch to rebuild the bladder neck.
RESULTS: The follow up is of 6-72 months. All patients could void without difficulty, no tumor recurrence and only 2 cases occurred slight incontinence. Other 30 cases regained the ability of controlling their urinations within 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy could be reduced by the method of preserving the membranous part of sphincter urethrae and preserving the neurovascular bundle lateral to the prostate in operation. It could also be avoided by evaginate the posterior wall of the bladder adequately and make an additional folding stitch to the bladder neck.