Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021
Memory impairment in alcohol use disorder is associated with regional frontal brain volumes.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fama Rosemary, Le Berre Anne-Pascale, Sassoon Stephanie A, Zahr Natalie M, Pohl Kilian M, Pfefferbaum Adolf, Sullivan Edith V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Episodic memory deficits occur in alcohol use disorder (AUD), but their anatomical substrates remain in question. Although persistent memory impairment is classically associated with limbic circuitry disruption, learning and retrieval of new information also relies on frontal systems. Despite AUD vulnerability of frontal lobe integrity, relations between frontal regions and memory processes have been under-appreciated.
METHODS: Participants included 91 AUD (49 with a drug diagnosis history) and 36 controls. Verbal and visual episodic memory scores were age- and education-corrected. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data yielded regional frontal lobe (precentral, superior, orbital, middle, inferior, supplemental motor, and medial) and total hippocampal volumes.
RESULTS: AUD were impaired on all memory scores and had smaller precentral frontal and hippocampal volumes than controls. Orbital, superior, and inferior frontal volumes and lifetime alcohol consumption were independent predictors of episodic memory in AUD. Selectivity was established with a double dissociation, where orbital frontal volume predicted verbal but not visual memory, whereas inferior frontal volumes predicted visual but not verbal memory. Further, superior frontal volumes predicted verbal memory in AUD alone, whereas orbital frontal volumes predicted verbal memory in AUD+drug abuse history.
CONCLUSIONS: Selective relations among frontal subregions and episodic memory processes highlight the relevance of extra-limbic regions in mnemonic processes in AUD. Memory deficits resulting from frontal dysfunction, unlike the episodic memory impairment associated with limbic dysfunction, may be more amenable to recovery with cessation or reduction of alcohol misuse and may partially explain the heterogeneity in episodic memory abilities in AUD.
METHODS: Participants included 91 AUD (49 with a drug diagnosis history) and 36 controls. Verbal and visual episodic memory scores were age- and education-corrected. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data yielded regional frontal lobe (precentral, superior, orbital, middle, inferior, supplemental motor, and medial) and total hippocampal volumes.
RESULTS: AUD were impaired on all memory scores and had smaller precentral frontal and hippocampal volumes than controls. Orbital, superior, and inferior frontal volumes and lifetime alcohol consumption were independent predictors of episodic memory in AUD. Selectivity was established with a double dissociation, where orbital frontal volume predicted verbal but not visual memory, whereas inferior frontal volumes predicted visual but not verbal memory. Further, superior frontal volumes predicted verbal memory in AUD alone, whereas orbital frontal volumes predicted verbal memory in AUD+drug abuse history.
CONCLUSIONS: Selective relations among frontal subregions and episodic memory processes highlight the relevance of extra-limbic regions in mnemonic processes in AUD. Memory deficits resulting from frontal dysfunction, unlike the episodic memory impairment associated with limbic dysfunction, may be more amenable to recovery with cessation or reduction of alcohol misuse and may partially explain the heterogeneity in episodic memory abilities in AUD.