International ophthalmology · 2023
Optic nerve sheath diameter and axial length in patients with optic disc drusen: a cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dağdelen Kenan, Dirican Emrah
Аннотация
AIM: Measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and the anteroposterior axial length of the eye in patients with optic disc drusen (ODD).
METHODS: A total of 43 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with ODD were included in the study. The ONSD and axial length were measured in the posterior position using an ultrasound device (E-Z Scan AB5500 +) probe with a 10 MHz frequency. The ONSD was measured 3 mm behind the globe wall. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine patients with ODD using ONSD. Any p-value of < 0.05 was accepted to demonstrate significance.
RESULTS: The ONSD was significantly higher (5.2 mm and 4.8 mm, p = 0.006, respectively), and the axial length was shorter (21.82 ± 2.15 mm and 23.27 ± 1.96 mm, p = 0.002, respectively) in the ODD group. The spherical equivalent was more commonly seen as hypermetropic in the ODD group (1.00 [- 0.85 to 1.75]). In the ROC analysis to determine the ONSD value in ODD diagnosis, the area under the curve was 0.6754 (95% confidence interval 0.559-0.788, p = 0.006). ONSD cutoff of 5.70 mm had a sensitivity of 0.366 and a specificity of 0.907 to diagnose ODD.
CONCLUSION: In this study, the ONSD was significantly higher in the ODD group. The axial length was shorter in the ODD group. This study is the first in the literature to evaluate the ONSD in patients with optic disc drusen. Further studies are needed in this regard.
METHODS: A total of 43 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with ODD were included in the study. The ONSD and axial length were measured in the posterior position using an ultrasound device (E-Z Scan AB5500 +) probe with a 10 MHz frequency. The ONSD was measured 3 mm behind the globe wall. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine patients with ODD using ONSD. Any p-value of < 0.05 was accepted to demonstrate significance.
RESULTS: The ONSD was significantly higher (5.2 mm and 4.8 mm, p = 0.006, respectively), and the axial length was shorter (21.82 ± 2.15 mm and 23.27 ± 1.96 mm, p = 0.002, respectively) in the ODD group. The spherical equivalent was more commonly seen as hypermetropic in the ODD group (1.00 [- 0.85 to 1.75]). In the ROC analysis to determine the ONSD value in ODD diagnosis, the area under the curve was 0.6754 (95% confidence interval 0.559-0.788, p = 0.006). ONSD cutoff of 5.70 mm had a sensitivity of 0.366 and a specificity of 0.907 to diagnose ODD.
CONCLUSION: In this study, the ONSD was significantly higher in the ODD group. The axial length was shorter in the ODD group. This study is the first in the literature to evaluate the ONSD in patients with optic disc drusen. Further studies are needed in this regard.