MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.3.596

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology · 1982

Neural responses of the cat carotid and aortic bodies to hypercapnia and hypoxia.

Fitzgerald R S, Dehghani G A

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The response (imp . s-1) of single- or few-fiber preparations from the carotid body (10 experiments) and the aortic body (5 experiments) to various levels of hypercapnia on different backgrounds of hypoxia were analyzed by two statistical techniques--analysis of variance and the Duncan's new multiple-range test. These analyses showed an initial statistically significant increase in the slope of the response to increasing arterial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2) as PaO2 fell. But the slope of the response to carbon dioxide later showed a clear tendency to become less; i.e., no significant increase in imp . s-1 when a PaCO2 rose (substantially) with normoxic (carotid body) and hypoxic (carotid and aortic bodies) backgrounds. The response of the aortic body to hypercapnia showed no statistically significant increase if the background was hyperoxia or normoxia. The characteristic of the chemoreceptor to become saturated in its response to carbon dioxide while still retaining its ability to respond to hypoxia suggests the possibility that at least some of the mechanisms involved in the chemoreception of hypoxia differ from those involved in the chemoreception of hypercapnia.

Для цитирования: Fitzgerald R S, Dehghani G A. Neural responses of the cat carotid and aortic bodies to hypercapnia and hypoxia.. Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology. 1982. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.3.596.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.