Clinical and translational science · 2024
Efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy 2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide, a fast-acting meloxicam formulation, on moderate-to-severe pain following abdominal surgery: A phase III randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Xiaohua, Zhao Yanhua, Yang Mengchang, Ren Jinghua, Ouyang Wen, Wang Saiying, Shen Yufei, Gao Yuanli, Zhao Ling, Qin Zhong, Cao Jun, Xia Jiangyan, Zhou Hongmei, Zeng Haihua, Li Jiangang, Li Qiongcan, Jiang Haitao, Zhou Ruiren, Yuan Kaiming, Jin Shu'an, Zhang Xuanqiang, Wang Chunhui, Chen Yongquan, Dong Hailong, Lv Jieping, Yu Sen, Jiu Yonghui, Wang Qingsong, Su Diansan, Yu Weifeng
Аннотация
4-hydroxy 2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide (QP001), a novel long-lasting meloxicam formulation, may provide adequate postoperative pain relief with a good safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QP001 for moderate-to-severe pain following abdominal surgery. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial recruited patients undergoing abdominal surgery at 23 centers between October 30, 2022, and July 10, 2023. Patients were randomized to a QP001 or placebo group in a 2:1 ratio. Postoperative pain intensity was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale. The primary efficacy outcome was the area under curve (AUC) of pain intensity-time 0-24 h after awakening from anesthesia (AUC0-24). Adverse events and drug reactions were recorded to evaluate safety. A total of 258 patients underwent randomization, and 255 patients received at least one trial drug, including 170 in the QP001 group and 85 in the placebo group. Among these patients, 250 completed the study. The AUC0-24 was significantly lower in the QP001 group than in the placebo group (50.5 vs. 85.19, difference of 34.69 [40.7%], p < 0.0001). This was accompanied by a decrease in morphine use and an increase in patient satisfaction. Moreover, the overall adverse events or adverse drug reaction rates were similar between the QP001 and placebo groups. Among patients undergoing abdominal surgery, postoperative pain was significantly lower in the QP001 group than in the placebo group. QP001 has a great analgesic effect of up to 24 h and satisfactory safety in patients with moderate-to-severe abdominal pain.