Sleep · 2020
Sleep stage dynamics in young patients with sleep bruxism.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kishi Akifumi, Haraki Shingo, Toyota Risa, Shiraishi Yuki, Kamimura Mayo, Taniike Masako, Yatani Hirofumi, Kato Takafumi
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that sleep stage dynamics are different in patients with sleep bruxism (SB) and that these changes are associated with the occurrence of rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA).
METHODS: Fifteen healthy controls and 15 patients with SB underwent overnight polysomnography. Sleep variables and survival curves of continuous runs of each sleep stage were compared between the groups. Stage transition dynamics and the probability of stage fragmentation were analyzed for three epochs before and after the epoch with RMMA. Survival curves of continuous runs of each sleep stage, terminated with or without RMMA, were also compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in sleep variables between the groups, except for shorter sleep latency, shorter rapid eye movement (REM) latency, and longer total N1 duration in SB patients than in controls. REM sleep and N2 were significantly less continuous in SB patients than in controls. In the SB group, stage fragmentation probability was significantly increased for the epoch with RMMA compared with the baseline for all stages. Meanwhile, the occurrence of RMMA did not affect the continuity of N2 or REM; however, the occurrence of RMMA was preceded by more continuous N3 runs.
CONCLUSIONS: Sleep stage dynamics differed between SB patients and controls. RMMA does not result in sleep disruption but is likely associated with dissipation of sleep pressure. Less continuity of REM sleep in SB may provide insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of SB, which may be related to REM sleep processes such as cortical desynchronized states or brainstem activation.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy controls and 15 patients with SB underwent overnight polysomnography. Sleep variables and survival curves of continuous runs of each sleep stage were compared between the groups. Stage transition dynamics and the probability of stage fragmentation were analyzed for three epochs before and after the epoch with RMMA. Survival curves of continuous runs of each sleep stage, terminated with or without RMMA, were also compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in sleep variables between the groups, except for shorter sleep latency, shorter rapid eye movement (REM) latency, and longer total N1 duration in SB patients than in controls. REM sleep and N2 were significantly less continuous in SB patients than in controls. In the SB group, stage fragmentation probability was significantly increased for the epoch with RMMA compared with the baseline for all stages. Meanwhile, the occurrence of RMMA did not affect the continuity of N2 or REM; however, the occurrence of RMMA was preceded by more continuous N3 runs.
CONCLUSIONS: Sleep stage dynamics differed between SB patients and controls. RMMA does not result in sleep disruption but is likely associated with dissipation of sleep pressure. Less continuity of REM sleep in SB may provide insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of SB, which may be related to REM sleep processes such as cortical desynchronized states or brainstem activation.