MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102524

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024

Unraveling the gait dynamics - A comparative study of iASSIST and conventional total knee replacement techniques in osteoarthritic elderly patients.

Tanpure Sanket, Phadnis Ashish, Nagda Taral, Rathod Chasanal, Kothurkar Rohan, Chavan Ajay, Lekurwale Ramesh

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) stands as the most prevalent disability among the elderly population. Assessing functional outcomes after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) typically involves Gait analysis along with other evaluation methods. The objective of this study was to compare Gait results, including temporospatial parameters, joint angles, gait profile score (GPS), and movement analysis profiles (MAP), between conventional and iASSIST TKR techniques.

METHOD: The study involved 21 participants (mean age 68.4 ± 4.2 years), with 16 females and 5 males. Among them, 11 patients had traditional surgery (15 TKR), and 10 patients had iASSIST surgery (13 TKR), totaling 28 knees (7 bilateral). The pre-operative Gait analysis was conducted one day before the surgical procedure, whereas the postoperative Gait analysis was performed, on average, 210 ± 20 days after surgery. Gait analysis was conducted using the Qualisys Motion capture system, operating at a rate of 120 Hz. The data were thoroughly analyzed using Visual 3D C-Motion Software.

RESULTS

An analysis of gait biomechanics metrics, encompassing temporospatial parameters, joint angles, GPS, and MAP, was undertaken. Significant differences were observed in sagittal plane joint angles of the pelvis and hip, transverse plane joint angles of the knee, cadence, and MAP of foot internal/external rotation. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two TKR techniques in the remaining temporospatial variables, joint angles, GPS, or MAP.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed a significant difference between iASSIST-guided TKR and conventional TKR, demonstrating that the iASSIST procedure led to improvements in walking biomechanics. Findings hold potential utility for orthopedic surgeons in their decision-making processes, ultimately contributing to the improvement of functional outcomes following TKR.

Для цитирования: Tanpure Sanket, Phadnis Ashish, Nagda Taral, Rathod Chasanal, Kothurkar Rohan, Chavan Ajay, Lekurwale Ramesh. Unraveling the gait dynamics - A comparative study of iASSIST and conventional total knee replacement techniques in osteoarthritic elderly patients.. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102524.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.