Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2024
Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness on non-gated chest CT as an alternative to EAT volume on cardiac CT.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vural Murat, Dölek Betül Akdal, Kılıçkap Gülsüm, Kübra Bahadır Gülsüm, Celal Güneş Yasin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume is usually measured with ECG-gated computed tomography (CT). Measurement of EAT thickness is a more convenient method; however, it is not clear whether EAT thickness measured with non-gated CT is reliable and at which localization it agrees best with the EAT volume.
PURPOSE: To examine the agreement between ECG-gated EAT volume and non-gated EAT thickness measured from various localizations and to assess the predictive role of EAT thickness for high EAT volume.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: EAT thickness was measured at six locations using non-contrast thorax CT and EAT volume was measured using ECG-gated cardiac CT (n = 68). The correlation and agreement (Bland-Altman plots) between the thicknesses and EAT volume were assessed.
RESULTS: EAT thicknesses were significantly correlated with EAT volume (P < 0.001). The highest correlation (r = 0.860) and agreement were observed for the thickness adjacent to the right ventricular free wall. Also, EAT thickness at this location has a strong potential for discriminating high (>125 cm3) EAT volume (area under the ROC curve=0.889, 95% CI=0.801-0.977; P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EAT thickness for high EAT volume were 76.5%, 88.2%, 68.4%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the cutoff value of 5.75 cm; and 47.1%, 100%, 100%, and 85%, respectively, for the cutoff value of 8.10 cm.
CONCLUSION: EAT thickness measured on non-gated chest CT adjacent to the right ventricular free wall is a reliable and easy-to-use alternative to the volumetric quantification and has a strong potential to predict high EAT volume.
PURPOSE: To examine the agreement between ECG-gated EAT volume and non-gated EAT thickness measured from various localizations and to assess the predictive role of EAT thickness for high EAT volume.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: EAT thickness was measured at six locations using non-contrast thorax CT and EAT volume was measured using ECG-gated cardiac CT (n = 68). The correlation and agreement (Bland-Altman plots) between the thicknesses and EAT volume were assessed.
RESULTS: EAT thicknesses were significantly correlated with EAT volume (P < 0.001). The highest correlation (r = 0.860) and agreement were observed for the thickness adjacent to the right ventricular free wall. Also, EAT thickness at this location has a strong potential for discriminating high (>125 cm3) EAT volume (area under the ROC curve=0.889, 95% CI=0.801-0.977; P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EAT thickness for high EAT volume were 76.5%, 88.2%, 68.4%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the cutoff value of 5.75 cm; and 47.1%, 100%, 100%, and 85%, respectively, for the cutoff value of 8.10 cm.
CONCLUSION: EAT thickness measured on non-gated chest CT adjacent to the right ventricular free wall is a reliable and easy-to-use alternative to the volumetric quantification and has a strong potential to predict high EAT volume.