AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2001
Stenting as first option for endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lanciego C, Chacón J L, Julián A, Andrade J, López L, Martinez B, Cruz M, García-García L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Endoprostheses were inserted in cancer patients with superior vena cava syndrome to assess their effectiveness as first-choice, initial treatment for relief of symptoms.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Wallstent prostheses (n = 73) of various lengths (5-14 cm; median, 7 cm) and diameters (10-16 mm; median, 16 mm) were inserted in 52 cancer patients (51 men, 1 woman; age range, 44-78 years; mean, 63 years) who were diagnosed and confirmed by cavography or phlebography as having superior vena cava syndrome. A single stent was sufficient in 37 patients, two stents were required in 11, three stents in two, and four stents in another two patients. Contraindications for the procedure were severe cardiopathy or coagulopathy.
RESULTS: Resolution of symptoms was achieved in all patients within 72 hr. At follow-up, six obstructions, one partial migration to the right atrium, two incorrect placements, and four stent "shortenings" were noted. All were successfully resolved by repeated stenting. Symptom-free survival ranged from 2 days to 17 months (mean, 6.4 months). At the time of this writing, eight patients are alive and have patent stents. The rest have died from their cancer.
CONCLUSION: The Wallstent vascular endoprosthesis is an effective initial treatment in superior vena cava syndrome of neoplastic origin. Morbidity and complications are minimal. Clinical relief of symptoms is rapid; therefore, the Wallstent endoprosthesis is highly recommended as the first choice for palliative treatment of superior vena cava syndrome, especially because the clinical decision for subsequent chemotherapy or radiotherapy or surgery is not in any way prejudiced.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Wallstent prostheses (n = 73) of various lengths (5-14 cm; median, 7 cm) and diameters (10-16 mm; median, 16 mm) were inserted in 52 cancer patients (51 men, 1 woman; age range, 44-78 years; mean, 63 years) who were diagnosed and confirmed by cavography or phlebography as having superior vena cava syndrome. A single stent was sufficient in 37 patients, two stents were required in 11, three stents in two, and four stents in another two patients. Contraindications for the procedure were severe cardiopathy or coagulopathy.
RESULTS: Resolution of symptoms was achieved in all patients within 72 hr. At follow-up, six obstructions, one partial migration to the right atrium, two incorrect placements, and four stent "shortenings" were noted. All were successfully resolved by repeated stenting. Symptom-free survival ranged from 2 days to 17 months (mean, 6.4 months). At the time of this writing, eight patients are alive and have patent stents. The rest have died from their cancer.
CONCLUSION: The Wallstent vascular endoprosthesis is an effective initial treatment in superior vena cava syndrome of neoplastic origin. Morbidity and complications are minimal. Clinical relief of symptoms is rapid; therefore, the Wallstent endoprosthesis is highly recommended as the first choice for palliative treatment of superior vena cava syndrome, especially because the clinical decision for subsequent chemotherapy or radiotherapy or surgery is not in any way prejudiced.