Journal of surgical oncology · 2007
Immediate dynamic lymphoscintigraphy delivers no additional value to lymphoscintigraphy 3 hr after tracer injection in sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Doting M H Edwina, Stiekema H M Annemiek, de Vries Jakob, Lemstra Clara, Hoekstra Harald J, Vrieling Mirjam, Rietman Lianne, Jager Pieter L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Immediate dynamic imaging enables accurate definition of sentinel lymph nodes, whereas imaging 3 hr after tracer injection may lead to overestimation of the number of sentinel lymph nodes. A study was performed to define the value of lymphoscintigraphy immediately versus 3 hr after tracer injection in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer management.
METHODS: In 165 sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures preoperative immediate and 3 hr post-injection lymphoscintigraphy was performed after intraparenchymal tracer administration.
RESULTS: Lymph node visualization occurred in 63 immediate procedures (38%) versus in 163 procedures 3 hr post-injection (99%). In 17 procedures (10%) in which immediate lymphoscintigraphy had visualized sentinel lymph nodes, additional nodes had been seen on 3 hr post-injection lymphoscintigraphy. In eight of these procedures (5%) all nodes were detected in the same draining lymph node basin. Non-axillary sentinel lymph nodes were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 28 procedures (17%) and improved staging in three patients (5%).
CONCLUSION: The only impact of immediate lymphoscintigraphy was the possible omission of removal of 1-2 sec-echelon nodes per patient in 5% of patients. We consider this yield too low to continue immediate lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients.
METHODS: In 165 sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures preoperative immediate and 3 hr post-injection lymphoscintigraphy was performed after intraparenchymal tracer administration.
RESULTS: Lymph node visualization occurred in 63 immediate procedures (38%) versus in 163 procedures 3 hr post-injection (99%). In 17 procedures (10%) in which immediate lymphoscintigraphy had visualized sentinel lymph nodes, additional nodes had been seen on 3 hr post-injection lymphoscintigraphy. In eight of these procedures (5%) all nodes were detected in the same draining lymph node basin. Non-axillary sentinel lymph nodes were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 28 procedures (17%) and improved staging in three patients (5%).
CONCLUSION: The only impact of immediate lymphoscintigraphy was the possible omission of removal of 1-2 sec-echelon nodes per patient in 5% of patients. We consider this yield too low to continue immediate lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients.