Annals of surgical oncology · 2006
Selective application of axillary node dissection in elderly women with early breast cancer.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aziz Dalal, Gardner Sandra, Pritchard Kathleen, Paszat Lawrence, Holloway Claire M B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Routine use of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been questioned in elderly women. This study examines whether selective application of ALND in early stage breast cancer affects breast cancer-related survival.
METHODS: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, records of women >or=70 years of age with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed between 1990 and 1995 were reviewed. Hazard ratios (HR) of cause-specific survival (CSS) between women receiving ALND and those who did not were compared. To minimize the potential for bias in the selection of women to receive ALND, HR of CSS was compared within propensity analysis deciles.
RESULTS: 20,151 women entered the analysis. Median follow up was 6 years (interquartile range 4.33-7.67 years). Seventy-five percent underwent ALND. Women with higher risk disease and younger age were more likely to undergo ALND. Five year unadjusted CSS in women who did and did not receive ALND was 92.1% and 90.6%, respectively, with a HR of 0.85, P = 0.002. Using the propensity analysis method, the adjusted HR for CSS associated with ALND was 0.89, P = 0.066.
DISCUSSION: After adjusting for differences in the probability of receiving ALND, no clinically or statistically significant difference in survival was observed among women who received ALND when compared with those who did not, although we could not account for differences in co-morbidity or use of systemic therapy between groups.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons select elderly women with early stage breast cancer for ALND with a negligible impact on CSS.
METHODS: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, records of women >or=70 years of age with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed between 1990 and 1995 were reviewed. Hazard ratios (HR) of cause-specific survival (CSS) between women receiving ALND and those who did not were compared. To minimize the potential for bias in the selection of women to receive ALND, HR of CSS was compared within propensity analysis deciles.
RESULTS: 20,151 women entered the analysis. Median follow up was 6 years (interquartile range 4.33-7.67 years). Seventy-five percent underwent ALND. Women with higher risk disease and younger age were more likely to undergo ALND. Five year unadjusted CSS in women who did and did not receive ALND was 92.1% and 90.6%, respectively, with a HR of 0.85, P = 0.002. Using the propensity analysis method, the adjusted HR for CSS associated with ALND was 0.89, P = 0.066.
DISCUSSION: After adjusting for differences in the probability of receiving ALND, no clinically or statistically significant difference in survival was observed among women who received ALND when compared with those who did not, although we could not account for differences in co-morbidity or use of systemic therapy between groups.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons select elderly women with early stage breast cancer for ALND with a negligible impact on CSS.