Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2006
Axillary lymph node nanometastases are prognostic factors for disease-free survival and metastatic relapse in breast cancer patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Querzoli Patrizia, Pedriali Massimo, Rinaldi Rosa, Lombardi Anna Rita, Biganzoli Elia, Boracchi Patrizia, Ferretti Stefano, Frasson Claudia, Zanella Caterina, Ghisellini Sara, Ambrogi Federico, Antolini Laura, Piantelli Mauro, Iacobelli Stefano, Marubini Ettore, Alberti Saverio, Nenci Italo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Early breast cancer presents with a remarkable heterogeneity of outcomes. Undetected, microscopic lymph node tumor deposits may account for a significant fraction of this prognostic diversity. Thus, we systematically evaluated the presence of lymph node tumor cell deposits<or=0.2 mm in diameter [pN0(i+), nanometastases] and analyzed their prognostic effect.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Single-institution, consecutive patients with 8 years of median follow-up (n=702) were studied. To maximize chances of detecting micrometastases and nanometastases, whole-axilla dissections were analyzed. pN0 cases (n=377) were systematically reevaluated by lymph node (n=6676) step-sectioning and anticytokeratin immunohistochemical analysis. The risk of first adverse events and of distant relapse of bona fide pN0 patients was compared with that of pN0(i+), pN1mi, and pN1 cases.
RESULTS: Minimal lymph node deposits were revealed in 13% of pN0 patients. The hazard ratio for all adverse events of pN0(i+) versus pN0(i-) was 2.51 (P=0.00019). Hazards of pN1mi and pN0(i+) cases were not significantly different. A multivariate Cox model showed a hazard ratio of 2.16 for grouped pN0(i+)/pN1mi versus pN0(i-) (P=0.0005). Crude cumulative incidence curves for metastatic relapse were also significantly different (Gray's test chi2=5.54, P=0.019).
CONCLUSION: Nanometastases are a strong risk factor for disease-free survival and for metastatic relapse. These findings support the inclusion of procedures for nanometastasis detection in tumor-node-metastasis staging.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Single-institution, consecutive patients with 8 years of median follow-up (n=702) were studied. To maximize chances of detecting micrometastases and nanometastases, whole-axilla dissections were analyzed. pN0 cases (n=377) were systematically reevaluated by lymph node (n=6676) step-sectioning and anticytokeratin immunohistochemical analysis. The risk of first adverse events and of distant relapse of bona fide pN0 patients was compared with that of pN0(i+), pN1mi, and pN1 cases.
RESULTS: Minimal lymph node deposits were revealed in 13% of pN0 patients. The hazard ratio for all adverse events of pN0(i+) versus pN0(i-) was 2.51 (P=0.00019). Hazards of pN1mi and pN0(i+) cases were not significantly different. A multivariate Cox model showed a hazard ratio of 2.16 for grouped pN0(i+)/pN1mi versus pN0(i-) (P=0.0005). Crude cumulative incidence curves for metastatic relapse were also significantly different (Gray's test chi2=5.54, P=0.019).
CONCLUSION: Nanometastases are a strong risk factor for disease-free survival and for metastatic relapse. These findings support the inclusion of procedures for nanometastasis detection in tumor-node-metastasis staging.