MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.032

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2006

Assessment of clinical palpation of the axilla as a criterion for performing the sentinel node procedure in breast cancer.

Lanng C, Hoffmann J, Galatius H, Engel U

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: Clinically palpable lymph nodes (LNs) are regarded as a contraindication for performing the sentinel node (SN) procedure. Many studies have shown, however, that clinical assessment of axillary LNs is inaccurate. This study evaluated the reliability of clinical axillary LN assessment by experts and assessed whether inaccuracy can be related to LN size.

METHODS

Three hundred and one consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing either axillary dissection or SN were studied prospectively.

RESULTS

The risk of having metastasis to the LN was 40.4% if the preoperative clinical assessment was "non-palpable LN", 61.5% if the assessment was "palpable but benign LN" and 84.4% if it was "suspicious LN". There were no clinically significant differences in mean size either when the LN was palpable versus non-palpable, or when the LN had metastasis or not.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical assessment of axillary LNs as a criterion for offering the SN procedure is of little value.

Для цитирования: Lanng C, Hoffmann J, Galatius H, Engel U. Assessment of clinical palpation of the axilla as a criterion for performing the sentinel node procedure in breast cancer.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.032.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.