MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11325-026-03807-8

Медицинская библиотека · Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026

Inter-rater reliability in drug-induced sleep endoscopy: experience-driven interpretation, decision-making, and the emerging role of artificial intelligence.

Leone Federico, Omenetti Filippo, Bianchi Alessandro, Iannella Giannicola, Collettini Andrea, Nicoletti Saverio, Distefano Maria Elvira, Germini Moysey Yuliya, Rosciano Edoardo, Imbrogno Giorgio, Preti Andrea, Vultaggio Federica, Minnella Franco, Zanzi Riccardo, Salamanca Fabrizio, Ambrogi Federico, Mozzanica Francesco

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of DISE interpretation using the VOTE classification, assess variability in therapeutic decision-making, and explore the potential role of artificial intelligence (AI) in DISE evaluation.

METHODS

Twenty DISE recordings were retrospectively and independently evaluated by 12 raters (7 junior and 5 senior) and by a general-purpose AI model without task-specific training. Inter-rater agreement among human raters for obstruction grading and pattern classification was assessed using percentage agreement, Fleiss' kappa, and weighted kappa. Agreement with a reference standard (unanimous expert consensus) was analyzed. Treatment proposals were evaluated using exact match ratio and Jaccard similarity.

RESULTS

At baseline, agreement among human raters ranged from 43.6% to 68.0% for obstruction grading (weighted κ, 0.255-0.425) and from 60.8% to 79.3% for collapse pattern (Fleiss' κ, 0.287-0.370). Senior raters showed higher baseline agreement than junior raters across all anatomical levels for collapse pattern and at three of four levels for obstruction grading. Agreement with the expert consensus ranged from 70.0% to 90.0% for senior raters and from 35.0% to 85.0% for AI in baseline grading, and from 75.0% to 95.0% and 50.0% to 80.0%, respectively, in baseline pattern classification. For therapeutic recommendations, exact agreement was 70.0% for senior raters, 55.0% for junior raters, and 50.0% for AI; mean Jaccard similarity was 0.867, 0.833, and 0.742, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DISE interpretation remains complex and operator-dependent. Pattern classification appears more reproducible than grading. While a non-task-specific AI model captured clinically relevant patterns, it did not match expert performance in complex decision-making. AI may serve as a supportive tool, particularly for less experienced clinicians.

Для цитирования: Leone Federico, Omenetti Filippo, Bianchi Alessandro, Iannella Giannicola, Collettini Andrea, Nicoletti Saverio, Distefano Maria Elvira, Germini Moysey Yuliya, Rosciano Edoardo, Imbrogno Giorgio, Preti Andrea, Vultaggio Federica, Minnella Franco, Zanzi Riccardo, Salamanca Fabrizio, Ambrogi Federico, Mozzanica Francesco. Inter-rater reliability in drug-induced sleep endoscopy: experience-driven interpretation, decision-making, and the emerging role of artificial intelligence.. Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-026-03807-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.