American journal of surgery · 2024
Sublobar or lobar resection in early-stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer less than 2cm: A meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Lei, Zhou Jianming, Jing Shengjie, Liu Bin, Fang Jin, Xue Tao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to investigate whether sublobar resection is non-inferior to lobar resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer less than 2 cm.
METHODS: This is a meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register were searched up to June 3, 2023. The primary outcome was 5-year survival, and the secondary outcomes were 5-year disease-free survival, cancer-related mortality, recurrence rate, postoperative lung function and perioperative events.
RESULTS: A total of 5 studies enrolling 2035 patients were included. Sublobar resection was found to be non-inferior to lobar resection concerning the 5-year survival rate, 5-year disease-free survival rate and cancer-related mortality. However, sublobar resection was associated with higher recurrence rate and less reduction of postoperative lung function.
CONCLUSIONS: Sublobar resection was non-inferior to lobar resection in terms of survival outcomes and was associated with better postoperative lung function.
METHODS: This is a meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register were searched up to June 3, 2023. The primary outcome was 5-year survival, and the secondary outcomes were 5-year disease-free survival, cancer-related mortality, recurrence rate, postoperative lung function and perioperative events.
RESULTS: A total of 5 studies enrolling 2035 patients were included. Sublobar resection was found to be non-inferior to lobar resection concerning the 5-year survival rate, 5-year disease-free survival rate and cancer-related mortality. However, sublobar resection was associated with higher recurrence rate and less reduction of postoperative lung function.
CONCLUSIONS: Sublobar resection was non-inferior to lobar resection in terms of survival outcomes and was associated with better postoperative lung function.