MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.surge.2016.10.003

Медицинская библиотека · The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland · 2016

Internal anal sphincter: Clinical perspective.

Kumar Lalit, Emmanuel Anton

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To summarise current knowledge of Internal anal sphincter.

BACKGROUND

The internal anal sphincter (IAS) is the involuntary ring of smooth muscle in the anal canal and is the major contributor to the resting pressure in the anus. Structural injury or functional weakness of the muscle results in passive incontinence of faeces and flatus. With advent of new assessment and treatment modalities IAS has become an important topic for surgeons. This review was undertaken to summarise our current knowledge of internal anal sphincter and highlight the areas that need further research.

METHOD: The PubMed database was used to identify relevant studies relating to internal anal sphincter.

RESULTS

The available evidence has been summarised and advantages and limitations highlighted for the different diagnostic and therapeutic techniques.

CONCLUSION

Our understanding of the physiology and pharmacology of IAS has increased greatly in the last three decades. Additionally, there has been a rise in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques specifically targeting the IAS. Although these are promising, future research is required before these can be incorporated into the management algorithm.

Для цитирования: Kumar Lalit, Emmanuel Anton. Internal anal sphincter: Clinical perspective.. The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.10.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.