MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.007

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2016

Impact of hospital volume on quality indicators for rectal cancer surgery in British Columbia, Canada.

McColl Ryan J, McGahan Colleen E, Cai Eric, Olson Rob, Cheung Winson Y, Raval Manoj J, Phang Paul Terry, Karimuddin Ahmer A, Brown Carl J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The relationship between hospital volume and patient outcomes remains controversial for rectal cancer.

METHODS

This is a population-based database study. Patients treated with surgery for a stage I to III rectal adenocarcinoma from 2003 to 2009 were identified. High-volume hospitals (HVH) were those centers performing 20 surgeries or more per year. Primary outcomes were operative and perioperative factors that have proven influence on patient outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 2,081 patients had surgery for rectal cancer. Of these, 1,690 patients had surgery in an HVH and 391 had surgery in a low-volume hospital. On multivariate analysis, patients who had surgery in an HVH were more likely to have sphincter-preserving surgery, 12 or more lymph nodes removed with the tumor, neoadjuvant radiation therapy, and receive pre-operative or postoperative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For rectal cancer patients in British Columbia, Canada, being treated at an HVH is associated with several quality indicators linked to better patient outcomes.

Для цитирования: McColl Ryan J, McGahan Colleen E, Cai Eric, Olson Rob, Cheung Winson Y, Raval Manoj J, Phang Paul Terry, Karimuddin Ahmer A, Brown Carl J. Impact of hospital volume on quality indicators for rectal cancer surgery in British Columbia, Canada.. American journal of surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.