International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024
Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Operator and Patient Acceptability Using the Traditional Isolation System vs a New Isolation Tool (Intraoral Cheek and Lip Retractor Mouth Opener Tool).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chauhan Keyur M, Sodani Vasudha, Sharma Devdatt J, Solanki Harsh H, Shah Reetu D, Agarwal Vaishnavi R
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Isolation plays an important role in dentistry. It is mandatory to maintain isolation during various dental treatments. A simple new isolation tool (intraoral cheek and lip retractor mouth opener tool) is available, which is a multipurpose tool. The need for the study was to evaluate the functionality of the new isolation tool.
AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the traditional isolation method with the new isolation tool. A questionnaire pattern was adopted for the present study. The study was then conducted to evaluate the patient acceptability and ease of access for the operator.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total 200 pediatric patients were included in the study; they were divided into two groups. Group I-isolation with the new isolation tool, group II-isolation with cotton rolls and a mouth mirror. A structured questionnaire was given to the operators to evaluate the ease of use of the new isolation tool. A Likert scale was provided to the patients to evaluate the comfort of the new isolation tool during various treatments.
RESULT: Statistical analysis shows significant results by obtaining the p-value < 0.05.
CONCLUSION: The study clearly shows that the new isolation tool is a better option in terms of retracting soft tissue, keeping the mouth open, and maintaining isolation.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This new tool helps in the retraction of soft tissue as well as isolation, and it also keeps the mouth open.
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Chauhan KM, Sodani V, Sharma DJ, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Operator and Patient Acceptability Using the Traditional Isolation System vs a New Isolation Tool (Intraoral Cheek and Lip Retractor Mouth Opener Tool). Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(6):637-640.
AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the traditional isolation method with the new isolation tool. A questionnaire pattern was adopted for the present study. The study was then conducted to evaluate the patient acceptability and ease of access for the operator.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total 200 pediatric patients were included in the study; they were divided into two groups. Group I-isolation with the new isolation tool, group II-isolation with cotton rolls and a mouth mirror. A structured questionnaire was given to the operators to evaluate the ease of use of the new isolation tool. A Likert scale was provided to the patients to evaluate the comfort of the new isolation tool during various treatments.
RESULT: Statistical analysis shows significant results by obtaining the p-value < 0.05.
CONCLUSION: The study clearly shows that the new isolation tool is a better option in terms of retracting soft tissue, keeping the mouth open, and maintaining isolation.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This new tool helps in the retraction of soft tissue as well as isolation, and it also keeps the mouth open.
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Chauhan KM, Sodani V, Sharma DJ, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Operator and Patient Acceptability Using the Traditional Isolation System vs a New Isolation Tool (Intraoral Cheek and Lip Retractor Mouth Opener Tool). Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(6):637-640.