The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine · 2011
Surgical management of vulvar lymphangioma circumscriptum: two case reports.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ikeda Masae, Muramatsu Toshinari, Shida Masako, Hirasawa Takeshi, Ishimoto Hitoshi, Izumi Shu-ichiro, Mikami Mikio
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of major labiaectomy as a surgical management of vulvar lymphangioma circumscriptum, we report two cases of this rare clinical entity.
CASE REPORTS: Two female patients, aged 56 and 68 years, presented with persistent edema of the lower limbs, papule-like condyloma of the labia majora, and lymph oozing from these papules of the vulva, which had developed 24 and 10 years, respectively, after radical hysterectomy with adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy for cervical cancer. After major labiaectomy was performed, symptoms in the first case, of extensive resected skin margin, improved clearly, in the second case, vulvar lymphangioma circumscriptum was more severe than in the first case, and a small amount of lymph oozing occurred from residual papules of the labia majora. In both cases, histology revealed lymphangioma circumscriptum of the vulva.
CONCLUSION: Major labiaectomy is an effective therapy for vulvar lymphangioma circumscriptum. Particularly, in the case which was extensive and deep resected skin margin, symptoms such as papules of the labia majora and lymph oozing from these papules of the vulva associated with lymphangioma seemed to be clearly improved.
CASE REPORTS: Two female patients, aged 56 and 68 years, presented with persistent edema of the lower limbs, papule-like condyloma of the labia majora, and lymph oozing from these papules of the vulva, which had developed 24 and 10 years, respectively, after radical hysterectomy with adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy for cervical cancer. After major labiaectomy was performed, symptoms in the first case, of extensive resected skin margin, improved clearly, in the second case, vulvar lymphangioma circumscriptum was more severe than in the first case, and a small amount of lymph oozing occurred from residual papules of the labia majora. In both cases, histology revealed lymphangioma circumscriptum of the vulva.
CONCLUSION: Major labiaectomy is an effective therapy for vulvar lymphangioma circumscriptum. Particularly, in the case which was extensive and deep resected skin margin, symptoms such as papules of the labia majora and lymph oozing from these papules of the vulva associated with lymphangioma seemed to be clearly improved.