Academic radiology · 2023
An MRI-Based Radiomics Nomogram to Distinguish Ductal Carcinoma In Situ with Microinvasion From Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of Breast Cancer.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Zengjie, Lin Qing, Wang Haibo, Wang Guanqun, Fu Guangming, Bian Tiantian
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate preoperative differentiation between ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) could facilitate treatment optimization and individualized risk assessment. The present study aims to build and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) that could distinguish DCISM from pure DCIS breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 140 patients obtained between March 2019 and November 2022 at our institution were included. Patients were randomly divided into a training (n = 97) and a test set (n = 43). Patients in both sets were further split into DCIS and DCISM subgroups. The independent clinical risk factors were selected by multivariate logistic regression to establish the clinical model. The optimal radiomics features were chosen by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and a radiomics signature was built. The nomogram model was constructed by integrating the radiomics signature and independent risk factors. The discrimination efficacy of our nomogram was assessed by using calibration and decision curves.
RESULTS: Six features were selected to construct the radiomics signature for distinguishing DCISM from DCIS. The radiomics signature and nomogram model exhibited better calibration and validation performance in the training (AUC 0.815, 0.911, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.703-0.926, 0.848-0.974) and test (AUC 0.830, 0.882, 95% CI, 0.672-0.989, 0.764-0.999) sets than in the clinical factor model (AUC 0.672, 0.717, 95% CI, 0.544-0.801, 0.527-0.907). The decision curve also demonstrated that the nomogram model exhibited good clinical utility.
CONCLUSION: The proposed noninvasive MRI-based radiomics nomogram model showed good performance in distinguishing DCISM from DCIS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 140 patients obtained between March 2019 and November 2022 at our institution were included. Patients were randomly divided into a training (n = 97) and a test set (n = 43). Patients in both sets were further split into DCIS and DCISM subgroups. The independent clinical risk factors were selected by multivariate logistic regression to establish the clinical model. The optimal radiomics features were chosen by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and a radiomics signature was built. The nomogram model was constructed by integrating the radiomics signature and independent risk factors. The discrimination efficacy of our nomogram was assessed by using calibration and decision curves.
RESULTS: Six features were selected to construct the radiomics signature for distinguishing DCISM from DCIS. The radiomics signature and nomogram model exhibited better calibration and validation performance in the training (AUC 0.815, 0.911, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.703-0.926, 0.848-0.974) and test (AUC 0.830, 0.882, 95% CI, 0.672-0.989, 0.764-0.999) sets than in the clinical factor model (AUC 0.672, 0.717, 95% CI, 0.544-0.801, 0.527-0.907). The decision curve also demonstrated that the nomogram model exhibited good clinical utility.
CONCLUSION: The proposed noninvasive MRI-based radiomics nomogram model showed good performance in distinguishing DCISM from DCIS.