Pathologic Tumor Size versus Mammography, Sonography, and MRI in Breast Cancer Based on Pathologic Subtypes.

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for imaging of breast pathology has historically been mammography and sonography. MRI is a modern adjunct in the surgeon's toolkit. We looked to examine the differences in imaging modalities and their ability to predict the size in relation to the pathologic size after excision with focus on pathologic subtypes.

METHODS

We analyzed patient records across a 4-year period from 2017 to 2021 who were treated surgically for breast cancer at our facility. We used a retrospective chart review to collect measurements that were recorded of the tumors by the radiologist for available mammography, ultrasound, and MRI which were compared to pathology report measurements of the final specimens. We subdivided the results by pathologic subtypes including invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

RESULTS

658 total patients met criteria for analysis. Mammography overestimated specimens with DCIS by 1.93 mm (P = .15), US underestimated by .56 (.55), and MRI overestimated by 5.77 mm (P < .01). There was no statistically significant difference in any modalities with IDC. With specimens of ILC, all 3 imaging modalities underestimated tumor size, with only US being significant.

DISCUSSION: Mammography and MRI consistently overestimated tumor size with the exception of ILC while US underestimated tumor size on all pathologic subtypes. MRI significantly overestimated tumor size in DCIS by 5.77 mm. Mammography was the most accurate imaging modality for all pathologic subtypes and never had a statistically significant difference from actual tumor size.