MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.03.007

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2015

Parotid gland tumors: a retrospective study of 154 patients.

Maahs Gerson Schulz, Oppermann Paula de Oliveira, Maahs Lucas Gerhard Peter, Machado Filho Geraldo, Ronchi André Dajori

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Benign tumors of the parotid gland comprise the majority of salivary gland tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical characteristics of parotid gland tumors submitted to surgical treatment by the same surgeon.

METHODS

Retrospective study with 154 patients who had parotid gland tumors. Clinical and histological data, type of surgery, and complications were assessed and described.

RESULTS

The main manifestation was a mass with a median evolution of 12 months for benign tumors and five months for malignant tumors. Ultrasonography was the most frequent complementary exam. Pleomorphic adenoma was the most common of the benign tumors, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma was the most frequent malignant tumor. Superficial parotidectomy with preservation of the facial nerve was the most common surgical procedure and reversible paresis of branches of the facial nerve was the most common complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Pleomorphic adenoma is the most common parotid gland tumor and superficial parotidectomy with preservation of the facial nerve is the most common and appropriate treatment for most low-morbidity tumors.

Для цитирования: Maahs Gerson Schulz, Oppermann Paula de Oliveira, Maahs Lucas Gerhard Peter, Machado Filho Geraldo, Ronchi André Dajori. Parotid gland tumors: a retrospective study of 154 patients.. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.03.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.