Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025
Utility of oral rehydration jelly in probe method endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamada Shinya, Takatori Hajime, Miyazawa Masaki, Hayashi Tomoyuki, Seki Akihiro, Nakagawa Hidetoshi, Nio Kouki, Iida Noriho, Shimakami Tetsuro, Yamashita Taro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: When performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) using a miniature probe, filling the lumen with water is necessary. However, because of gravity and peristalsis, satisfactory images are often not obtained. Recently, it has been reported that injecting a viscous gel instead of water could facilitate EUS imaging.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if EUS performed with rehydration jelly returned interpretable images when the standard method did not.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
METHODS: EUS was first attempted in 50 patients using the conventional water-filling method; in cases where satisfactory images were not obtained, EUS was additionally performed using oral rehydration jelly (OS-1). Five endoscopists evaluated the obtained images, and their outcomes were examined.
RESULTS: Satisfactory images were not obtained in 34 cases when using the water-filling method. The images obtained using the jelly method were improved compared to the water-filling method in 29 cases, with a significant improvement in 18 cases. No complications were observed with the jelly method.
CONCLUSION: For EUS, the jelly method will likely yield good images when satisfactory image quality cannot be obtained using the water-filling method.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if EUS performed with rehydration jelly returned interpretable images when the standard method did not.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
METHODS: EUS was first attempted in 50 patients using the conventional water-filling method; in cases where satisfactory images were not obtained, EUS was additionally performed using oral rehydration jelly (OS-1). Five endoscopists evaluated the obtained images, and their outcomes were examined.
RESULTS: Satisfactory images were not obtained in 34 cases when using the water-filling method. The images obtained using the jelly method were improved compared to the water-filling method in 29 cases, with a significant improvement in 18 cases. No complications were observed with the jelly method.
CONCLUSION: For EUS, the jelly method will likely yield good images when satisfactory image quality cannot be obtained using the water-filling method.