Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2019
[Temporary urethral stents changes as an alternative treatment for neurological bladder].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Werlé P, Tricard T, Jochum F, Schroeder A, Gaullier M, Saussine C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with detrusor-sphincter dysynergia (DSD) who are unable to perform self-catheterisation can benefit from an endoscopic treatment. We chose regular urethral stent changes as an alternative to sphincterotomy in this kind of patients. The purpose of this study is to show that temporary urethral stents changes represent a treatment option with a reasonable morbidity for patients with DSD.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients in our center who had been treated with urethral stents from April 2005 to September 2017. The stent changes were performed every 12 to 18 months depending on urethrovesical fibroscopy findings. The primary endpoint was treatment continuation.
RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled in our study and the average follow-up duration was 46 months [18.5-53.25]. Primary treatment failure was seen in 14 (32%) patients mainly due to problems related to equipment (n=3) and urinary retention (n=2). Four patients died before their first stent change. The treatment was successful in 30 (68%) patients, of whom 10 (33%) subsequently adopted a voiding mode change. We lost sight of 5 patients (11%) during follow-up. The main complications were urinary retention (29%), urinary tract infections (27%) and stent migration (18%). Fifteen (34%) experienced grade III-IV complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Regular urethral stent changes represent an alternative treatment option for patients with DSD but with a significant morbidity.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients in our center who had been treated with urethral stents from April 2005 to September 2017. The stent changes were performed every 12 to 18 months depending on urethrovesical fibroscopy findings. The primary endpoint was treatment continuation.
RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled in our study and the average follow-up duration was 46 months [18.5-53.25]. Primary treatment failure was seen in 14 (32%) patients mainly due to problems related to equipment (n=3) and urinary retention (n=2). Four patients died before their first stent change. The treatment was successful in 30 (68%) patients, of whom 10 (33%) subsequently adopted a voiding mode change. We lost sight of 5 patients (11%) during follow-up. The main complications were urinary retention (29%), urinary tract infections (27%) and stent migration (18%). Fifteen (34%) experienced grade III-IV complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Regular urethral stent changes represent an alternative treatment option for patients with DSD but with a significant morbidity.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.