Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2019
Two-port myomectomy using bag-contained manual morcellation: A comparison with three-port myomectomy using power morcellation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Juseok, Song Yong Jung, Na Yong Jin, Kim Hwi Gon
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of two-port myomectomy using bag-contained manual morcellation compared to three-port myomectomy using power morcellation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 428 cases of either two-port or three-port laparoscopic myomectomy performed by single operator in the university hospital between January 2011 and December 2016.
RESULTS: The cohorts of three-port myomectomy with power morcellation was consisted of two hundred and forty-eight patients. One hundred and eighty patients underwent two-port myomectomy with manual morcellation in contained bag. Two-port group showed shorter hospital stay (5.16 ± 1.39 d vs. 4.83 ± 1.19 d, p = 0.001), less estimated blood loss (61.8 ± 58.2 mL vs. 50.2 ± 52.4 mL, p = 0.001), and higher hemoglobin level at postoperative day 1 (10.7 ± 1.17 g/dL vs. 11.0 ± 1.14 g/dL, p = 0.028) with statistical significance. Morcellation time (25.8 ± 9.30 min vs. 18.9 ± 10.11 min, p = 0.001) and total operative time (82.4 ± 30.19 min vs. 76.4 ± 25.47 min, p = 0.047) were also significantly shorter in two-port group. There were no identified spillages of fibroids, ruptures of specimen bag during manual morcellation in two-port myomectomy. In both groups, there were no cases of leiomyosarcoma diagnosed postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: Two-port laparoscopic myomectomy with bag-contained manual morcellation is a feasible and safe alternative for three-port with power morcellation. Its surgical outcomes were shown to be superior to conventional laparoscopic myomectomy according to our study but further evaluation in near future is needed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 428 cases of either two-port or three-port laparoscopic myomectomy performed by single operator in the university hospital between January 2011 and December 2016.
RESULTS: The cohorts of three-port myomectomy with power morcellation was consisted of two hundred and forty-eight patients. One hundred and eighty patients underwent two-port myomectomy with manual morcellation in contained bag. Two-port group showed shorter hospital stay (5.16 ± 1.39 d vs. 4.83 ± 1.19 d, p = 0.001), less estimated blood loss (61.8 ± 58.2 mL vs. 50.2 ± 52.4 mL, p = 0.001), and higher hemoglobin level at postoperative day 1 (10.7 ± 1.17 g/dL vs. 11.0 ± 1.14 g/dL, p = 0.028) with statistical significance. Morcellation time (25.8 ± 9.30 min vs. 18.9 ± 10.11 min, p = 0.001) and total operative time (82.4 ± 30.19 min vs. 76.4 ± 25.47 min, p = 0.047) were also significantly shorter in two-port group. There were no identified spillages of fibroids, ruptures of specimen bag during manual morcellation in two-port myomectomy. In both groups, there were no cases of leiomyosarcoma diagnosed postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: Two-port laparoscopic myomectomy with bag-contained manual morcellation is a feasible and safe alternative for three-port with power morcellation. Its surgical outcomes were shown to be superior to conventional laparoscopic myomectomy according to our study but further evaluation in near future is needed.