American journal of otolaryngology · 2021
Outcomes of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in community- vs. institution-performed cytology.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tessler Idit, Cohen Oded, Shochat Isaac, Teitelbaum Tali, Dagan Or, Meir Alona, Jaffe Anat, Avior Galit
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Despite the important role of the community in the assessment and risk stratification of patients with thyroid nodules, evidence-based data on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) performance in community clinics is lacking. We aim to evaluate BSRTC performance of aspirations taken in community clinics compared with primary referral center.
METHODS: Patients who underwent thyroid surgery between 2013 and 2018 at our institution were divided according to the fine needle aspirations (FNA) settings: community FNA (cFNA) vs. institutional FNA (iFNA). Demographics, BSRTC results and final pathology were collected. Diagnostic values were calculated for BSRTC categories (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]), and were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: A total of 268 nodules were included in the study; 77% (207) cFNA and 23% (61) iFNA. Patients in the community were younger (51.7 ± 15.1 vs. 56.6 years±14.8, p = 0.03) and with less epidemiology risk factors for thyroid cancer (1.9% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001). cFNA malignancy rate for BSRTC I-VI was 0%, 6.4%, 11.8%, 32.1%, 91.6% and 93.8% respectively. Best sensitivity was found for BSRTC III-VI in both groups (88% and 83%, cFNAs and iFNAs, respectively). Overall best performance was obtained for BSRTC V-VI for both groups (cfNA: 85%, 97%, 93%, 94% and 93%; iFNAs: 81%, 100%, 100%, 87% and 91%, for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Community-performed FNAs demonstrate acceptable BSRTC distribution and malignancy rates, comparable with a primary referral academic hospital. This supports the universality of the BSRTC 2017 and its recommendations also in the community.
METHODS: Patients who underwent thyroid surgery between 2013 and 2018 at our institution were divided according to the fine needle aspirations (FNA) settings: community FNA (cFNA) vs. institutional FNA (iFNA). Demographics, BSRTC results and final pathology were collected. Diagnostic values were calculated for BSRTC categories (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]), and were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: A total of 268 nodules were included in the study; 77% (207) cFNA and 23% (61) iFNA. Patients in the community were younger (51.7 ± 15.1 vs. 56.6 years±14.8, p = 0.03) and with less epidemiology risk factors for thyroid cancer (1.9% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001). cFNA malignancy rate for BSRTC I-VI was 0%, 6.4%, 11.8%, 32.1%, 91.6% and 93.8% respectively. Best sensitivity was found for BSRTC III-VI in both groups (88% and 83%, cFNAs and iFNAs, respectively). Overall best performance was obtained for BSRTC V-VI for both groups (cfNA: 85%, 97%, 93%, 94% and 93%; iFNAs: 81%, 100%, 100%, 87% and 91%, for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Community-performed FNAs demonstrate acceptable BSRTC distribution and malignancy rates, comparable with a primary referral academic hospital. This supports the universality of the BSRTC 2017 and its recommendations also in the community.