Urology · 2019
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Operating Room Versus Office-based Ureteral Stenting With the Novel Use of Nitrous Oxide Sedation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Doersch Karen M, Thai Kim H, Machen G Luke, Bird Erin T, Reilly Thomas P, El Tayeb Marawan M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and effectiveness of placing ureteral stents in an office-based setting vs in the operating room (OR).
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to examine outcomes, specifically complication rate, unanticipated hospitalizations, and stent failures, when patients received JJ stents in the clinic procedure suite, using local analgesia and/or nitrous oxide gas analgesia, compared to patients who had ureteral stents placed in the OR, typically with general anesthesia. Additionally, multivariable analysis was performed to determine predictors of complications.
RESULTS: Around 565 procedures were performed in the clinic and 179 were performed in the OR. The complication rate for the clinic group was 4.1%, compared to 7.8% in the OR group. Unplanned admissions to the hospital occurred after 3.0% of clinic procedures and 9.5% of OR procedures. Stent placements failed in 1.1% of clinic procedures and 0.56% of OR procedures. Clinic procedure time was 10 minutes vs 12 minutes in the OR (P <0.01). Clinic vs OR setting was not predictive of complications (P = 0.99). We did not identify factors that impacted complication rate in ureteral stent placement in the clinic vs OR setting. Notably, the procedure time for a clinic stent placement was significantly shorter than the OR stent placement.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates excellent outcomes with a novel approach to a standard procedure, with shorter procedure time and no difference in complication rates.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to examine outcomes, specifically complication rate, unanticipated hospitalizations, and stent failures, when patients received JJ stents in the clinic procedure suite, using local analgesia and/or nitrous oxide gas analgesia, compared to patients who had ureteral stents placed in the OR, typically with general anesthesia. Additionally, multivariable analysis was performed to determine predictors of complications.
RESULTS: Around 565 procedures were performed in the clinic and 179 were performed in the OR. The complication rate for the clinic group was 4.1%, compared to 7.8% in the OR group. Unplanned admissions to the hospital occurred after 3.0% of clinic procedures and 9.5% of OR procedures. Stent placements failed in 1.1% of clinic procedures and 0.56% of OR procedures. Clinic procedure time was 10 minutes vs 12 minutes in the OR (P <0.01). Clinic vs OR setting was not predictive of complications (P = 0.99). We did not identify factors that impacted complication rate in ureteral stent placement in the clinic vs OR setting. Notably, the procedure time for a clinic stent placement was significantly shorter than the OR stent placement.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates excellent outcomes with a novel approach to a standard procedure, with shorter procedure time and no difference in complication rates.