MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00005373-200012000-00017

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of trauma · 2000

Infratentorial traumatic brain hemorrhage: may outcome be predicted by initial GCS?

Harris O A, Lane B, Lewen A, Matz P G

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Overall prognosis of nonpenetrating traumatic brain hemorrhage may be predicted by neurologic function days after insult. The relationship between immediate function and outcome has not been examined for infratentorial traumatic brain hemmorhage (iTBH) identified on computed tomographic (CT) scan. Given the severity of brain stem injury, it is conceivable that immediate function may be predictive.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1,500 brain injuries occurring at our institution identified 18 patients (1.2%) with iTBH on CT scan (eight brain stem, five cerebellum, five both). Demographics, supratentorial injuries, and outcome at 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale) were recorded.

RESULTS

Initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in 11 patients was less than 5 (group I). Seven patients had GCS scores greater than or equal to 6 (group II). Nine patients in group I either died or were vegetative. In group II, one died; none were vegetative (p < 0.02). Regression analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between initial GCS and Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at 6 months for all patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that initial GCS score may be predictive of long-term outcome in patients with CT scan evidence of iTBH-a relationship to be explored further for prognostic information.

Для цитирования: Harris O A, Lane B, Lewen A, Matz P G. Infratentorial traumatic brain hemorrhage: may outcome be predicted by initial GCS?. The Journal of trauma. 2000. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200012000-00017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.