Clinical outcomes in patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas managed conservatively.
Аннотация
CONTEXT: The natural history and the optimum management of patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are unclear.
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to characterize the natural history of patients with NFPAs managed conservatively.
DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients presenting to a tertiary referral centre between 1986 and 2009. Patients with pituitary adenomas and no clinical or biochemical evidence of hormonal hypersecretion were included. Those presenting with apoplexy or a radiological follow-up period of less than 1 year were excluded. The pituitary imaging for all patients was re-examined by two neuroradiologists in consensus.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were change in tumour size and pituitary hormone function.
RESULTS
Sixty-six patients were managed conservatively for a mean follow-up period of 4·3 years (range: 1-14·7). Forty-seven (71%) had a macroadenoma, and nineteen (29%) had a microadenoma. Tumour size decreased or remained stable in 40% of macroadenomas and 47% of microadenomas. The median annual growth rate of enlarging macroadenomas and microadenomas was 1·0 mm/year and 0·4 mm/year, respectively. The median annual growth rate of macroadenomas was significantly higher than that of microadenomas (P < 0·01). Sixty-eight percentage of patients with a macroadenoma had pituitary hormone deficiency in one or more axes, compared to 42% of those with a microadenoma.
CONCLUSION
Patients with NFPAs without optic chiasm compression can be managed conservatively. All patients need pituitary function assessment, irrespective of tumour size. These findings provide clinically relevant data for the management of patients with NFPAs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.