Clinical breast cancer · 2024
The Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of HER2-Low Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between HER2-Low and HER2-Zero Subtypes.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nishimura Reiki, Fujiki Yoshitaka, Taira Tetsuhiko, Miyaki Toshiko, Kanemitsu Shuichi, Yotsumoto Daisuke, Teraoka Megumi, Kawano Junko, Gondo Naomi, Mitsueda Reiko, Baba Shinichi, Ohi Yasuyo, Rai Yoshiaki, Sagara Yoshiaki, Sagara Yasuaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC. However, it is still uncertain whether HER2-low BC can be categorized as a distinct biological/clinical subgroup with any prognostic significance.
METHODS: Invasive BC cases (n = 10,215) with Stage I-III were retrospectively analyzed to determine the HER2 status. The HER2 status was then divided into 3 groups: HER2-0, HER2-low, and HER2-positive.
RESULTS: The HER2 status was classified as HER2-0 in 1,227 cases (12.0%), HER2-low in 7,209 cases (70.6%), and HER2-positive in 1779 cases (17.4%). HER2-low cases had more positive nodes and were significantly associated with positive ER/PgR, lower nuclear grade, and lower Ki-67 index. HER2-0 had the lowest OS rate in the primary cases and after recurrence. HER2-0 in the node positive group had the lowest OS and was significantly different from HER2-low in the same group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate for NAC was lowest in the HER2-low group. The DFS after NAC was significantly better in all the pCR cases, regardless of the HER2 status. However, the DFS was significantly lower in the HER2-low non-pCR cases.
CONCLUSION: HER2-low accounted for 70% of the cases and correlated with favorable biological markers. The HER2-low group had a significantly better OS than the HER2-0 group. However, the response to NAC was low in the HER2-low group, and this group had the poorest prognosis among all the non-pCR cases. These findings indicate that HER2-low may have a different biology and prognosis and therefore should be classified as a new entity.
METHODS: Invasive BC cases (n = 10,215) with Stage I-III were retrospectively analyzed to determine the HER2 status. The HER2 status was then divided into 3 groups: HER2-0, HER2-low, and HER2-positive.
RESULTS: The HER2 status was classified as HER2-0 in 1,227 cases (12.0%), HER2-low in 7,209 cases (70.6%), and HER2-positive in 1779 cases (17.4%). HER2-low cases had more positive nodes and were significantly associated with positive ER/PgR, lower nuclear grade, and lower Ki-67 index. HER2-0 had the lowest OS rate in the primary cases and after recurrence. HER2-0 in the node positive group had the lowest OS and was significantly different from HER2-low in the same group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate for NAC was lowest in the HER2-low group. The DFS after NAC was significantly better in all the pCR cases, regardless of the HER2 status. However, the DFS was significantly lower in the HER2-low non-pCR cases.
CONCLUSION: HER2-low accounted for 70% of the cases and correlated with favorable biological markers. The HER2-low group had a significantly better OS than the HER2-0 group. However, the response to NAC was low in the HER2-low group, and this group had the poorest prognosis among all the non-pCR cases. These findings indicate that HER2-low may have a different biology and prognosis and therefore should be classified as a new entity.