MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/occmed/kqx011

Медицинская библиотека · Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2017

Long-term epidemiological observation of asbestos-related diseases in Poland, 1970-2015.

Swiatkowska B, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Occupational exposure to asbestos constitutes a major public health concern. Despite this in many countries, data and registration systems for occupational asbestos-related diseases are non-existent or poorly developed.

AIMS: To analyse the incidence of occupational asbestos-related diseases in Poland between the years 1970 and 2015, with particular emphasis on the periods after introduction of a ban on asbestos and following introduction of a surveillance programme.

METHODS

Analysis based on all medically recognized cases, certified as occupational diseases and reported obligatorily from all over the country to the Central Register of Occupational Diseases.

RESULTS

During the period 1970-2015, 4983 cases were reported as asbestos-related diseases. The most prevalent were asbestosis, lung cancer, diseases of pleura or pericardium and mesothelioma. A considerable increase in the number of such cases from the beginning of their registration until 2004 occurred after introduction of the Amiantus programme, a nationwide programme of periodic medical examinations for former asbestos workers.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of a medical surveillance programme improved case recognition and allowed a more reliable estimate of the number of reported asbestos-related diseases.

Для цитирования: Swiatkowska B, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N. Long-term epidemiological observation of asbestos-related diseases in Poland, 1970-2015.. Occupational medicine (Oxford, England). 2017. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqx011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.