Neurourology and urodynamics · 2022
Outcomes of penile inversion vaginoplasty and robotic-assisted peritoneal flap vaginoplasty in obese and nonobese patients.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Acar Omer, Alcantar Jonathan, Millman Alexandra, Naha Ushasi, Cedeno Juan Diego, Morgantini Luca, Kocjancic Ervin
Аннотация
AIM: To explore the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of gender-affirming vaginoplasty.
METHODS: A cohort consisting of all gender-affirming vaginoplasties in our practice between September 27th, 2018, and September 1st, 2022 were identified, and data were retrospectively collected. Patients were classified as obese if their BMI was ≥30 kg/m2 at the time of surgery and nonobese if their BMI was <30 kg/m2 . Complications were assigned a Clavien-Dindo grade and grouped as Grade ≥2 versus Grade ≤1. Patient-reported functional outcomes of intact erogenous sensation, tactile sensation, ability to achieve penetrative vaginal intercourse, and cosmetic satisfaction were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients with a mean follow-up time of 6.9 months were included. Seventeen patients (mean BMI = 36.8 kg/m2 ) were classified as obese and 41 patients (mean BMI = 25.1 kg/m2 ) were classified as nonobese. No significant differences in outcomes were identified in the obese versus nonobese groups in terms of the incidence of complications. Patient-reported functional outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar results can be achieved with gender-affirming vaginoplasty in obese patients when compared to their nonobese counterparts. Eligibility for this procedure should not be restricted based on BMI alone.
METHODS: A cohort consisting of all gender-affirming vaginoplasties in our practice between September 27th, 2018, and September 1st, 2022 were identified, and data were retrospectively collected. Patients were classified as obese if their BMI was ≥30 kg/m2 at the time of surgery and nonobese if their BMI was <30 kg/m2 . Complications were assigned a Clavien-Dindo grade and grouped as Grade ≥2 versus Grade ≤1. Patient-reported functional outcomes of intact erogenous sensation, tactile sensation, ability to achieve penetrative vaginal intercourse, and cosmetic satisfaction were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients with a mean follow-up time of 6.9 months were included. Seventeen patients (mean BMI = 36.8 kg/m2 ) were classified as obese and 41 patients (mean BMI = 25.1 kg/m2 ) were classified as nonobese. No significant differences in outcomes were identified in the obese versus nonobese groups in terms of the incidence of complications. Patient-reported functional outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar results can be achieved with gender-affirming vaginoplasty in obese patients when compared to their nonobese counterparts. Eligibility for this procedure should not be restricted based on BMI alone.