Digestive surgery · 2001
Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: influence of a Billroth I versus a Billroth II type of reconstruction on gastric emptying.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goei T H, van Berge Henegouwen M I, Slooff M J, van Gulik T M, Gouma D J, Eddes E H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIM: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a frequent problem after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Important risk factors are the presence of intra-abdominal complications. Searching for other causes, this study evaluates the influence of the type of reconstruction after a pancreatoduodenectomy (Billroth I vs. Billroth II; B I vs. B II on DGE.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed evaluating consecutive patients from two surgical institutes. 174 patients were included (B II type of reconstruction n = 123, period 1992-1996; B I type of reconstruction n = 51, period 1988-1998). DGE was defined by gastric stasis requiring nasogastric intubation for 10 days or more or the inability to tolerate a regular diet on or before the 14th postoperative day.
RESULTS: After a B I type of reconstruction, there was significantly longer nasogastric intubation period as compared with a B II type of reconstruction (B I median 13 days, range 4-47, B II median 6 days, range 1-40; p < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative commencement of a normal diet. Also significantly more patients had DGE after a B I (76%) as compared with a B II type of reconstruction (32%; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate a significantly higher incidence of DGE after a B I type of reconstruction as compared with a B II type reconstruction. The etiology remains speculative.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed evaluating consecutive patients from two surgical institutes. 174 patients were included (B II type of reconstruction n = 123, period 1992-1996; B I type of reconstruction n = 51, period 1988-1998). DGE was defined by gastric stasis requiring nasogastric intubation for 10 days or more or the inability to tolerate a regular diet on or before the 14th postoperative day.
RESULTS: After a B I type of reconstruction, there was significantly longer nasogastric intubation period as compared with a B II type of reconstruction (B I median 13 days, range 4-47, B II median 6 days, range 1-40; p < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative commencement of a normal diet. Also significantly more patients had DGE after a B I (76%) as compared with a B II type of reconstruction (32%; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate a significantly higher incidence of DGE after a B I type of reconstruction as compared with a B II type reconstruction. The etiology remains speculative.