MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/oem.2003.011262

Медицинская библиотека · Occupational and environmental medicine · 2004

No association between the use of cellular or cordless telephones and salivary gland tumours.

Hardell L, Hallquist A, Hansson Mild K, Carlberg M, Gertzén H, Schildt E-B, Dahlqvist A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To investigate the association between the use of cellular or cordless telephones and the risk for salivary gland tumours.

METHODS

Cases were assessed from the six regional cancer registries in Sweden. Four controls matched for sex and age in five year age groups were selected for each case. A total of 293 living cases and 1172 controls were included.

RESULTS

There were 267 (91%) participating cases and 1053 (90%) controls. Overall no significantly increased risk was found. Odds ratios were 0.92 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.44) for use of analogue phones, 1.01 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.50) for use of digital phones, and 0.99 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.43) for use of cordless phones. Similar results were found for different salivary gland localisations. No effect of tumour induction period or latency was seen, although few subjects reported use for more than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

No association between the use of cellular or cordless phones and salivary gland tumours was found, although this study does not permit conclusions for long term heavy use.

Для цитирования: Hardell L, Hallquist A, Hansson Mild K, Carlberg M, Gertzén H, Schildt E-B, Dahlqvist A. No association between the use of cellular or cordless telephones and salivary gland tumours.. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2003.011262.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.