MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.85475

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2025

A Case Report of a Successful Bilateral Lichtenstein Repair Using Elastic Tacks.

Mekhaeel Mekhaeel Shehata Fakhry, Protasov Andrey Vitalevitch, Salem Sameh Mohamed

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This manuscript is dedicated to the examination of a case involving a 55-year-old male patient who has experienced bilateral inguinal hernias for a duration of three years. The patient was subsequently referred to our department from the outpatient clinic for the purpose of determining an appropriate surgical intervention. The patient presented with comorbidities including primary arterial hypertension, duodenal ulcer, chronic prostatitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), chronic esophagitis, and occurrences of supraventricular tachycardia. Our research team elected to implement the Lichtenstein tension-free repair modification for both sides within a single surgical operation. Bilateral inguinal hernioplasty was performed successfully on both sides at the same surgical procedure, employing the Lichtenstein technique, which contributed to reducing the operative duration and postoperative complications regarding mesh implants secured with elastic absorbable tacks. The patient experienced no postoperative complications, such as neuralgia, seroma, foreign body sensation, or recurrence. The next five years were scheduled for follow-up every six months. The adoption of this technique yielded outcomes that met expectations.

Для цитирования: Mekhaeel Mekhaeel Shehata Fakhry, Protasov Andrey Vitalevitch, Salem Sameh Mohamed. A Case Report of a Successful Bilateral Lichtenstein Repair Using Elastic Tacks.. Cureus. 2025. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.85475.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.