Molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage from hospitalized patients and medical staff in Isfahan, Iran.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been accounted as one of the main risk factors for the development of complicated nosocomial infections. The present study aimed to determine nasal carriage rate, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and molecular characteristics of MRSA isolates.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was performed within 6 months period from July 2015 at 3 hospitals of Isfahan, Iran. Totally, 326 nasal samples were collected by cotton sterile swab from the nasal cavity of participants. Standard microbiological methods were used for identification S. aurues and MRSA isolates. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern was determined by the disc diffusion method according to the CLSI recommendation. Determination of SCCmec typing, agr groups, and virulence genes were performed by PCR method.
RESULTS
Overall, 23.6% of cases were S. aureus carriers including, 23.4% (25/107) of HCWs and 23.7% (52/219) of patients. The rate of MRSA nasal carriages among patients was found to be 51.9% and 16% in HCWs. The highest levels of resistance among MRSA isolates were against ampicillin (93.5%) and tetracycline (83.4%); while, the most effective antibiotics were vancomycin and co-trimoxazole with 100% and 71%, susceptibility. The presence of hla and pvl genes was detected in 80.6% and 3.2% of MRSA isolates, respectively. SCCmec types I, III, IV and V were found in 16.1%, 25.8%, 25.8%, and 16.1% of isolates, respectively. Moreover, agr group I was the predominant type with 43.3.
CONCLUSION
Our results showed a high rate of MRSA colonization in hospitalized patients which remains a significant healthcare problem in our region.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.