MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua er bi yan hou ke za zhi · 2004

[Largest extension of CO2 laser surgery for laryngeal cancer in experimental animals].

Huang Zhi-Gang, Han De-Min, Yu Zhen-Kun, Ni Xin, Chen Xiao-Hong

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To explore the security and limit resection extension of CO2 laser surgery for laryngeal cancer in experimental animal under self-retaining laryngoscope.

METHODS

Ten experimental dogs were selected and received CO2 laser surgery with self-retaining laryngoscope. Vertical partial or supraglottic horizontal laryngectomy was performed according to the surgical criteria. All the dogs were killed immediately (5/10) or 40 days later(5/10) by using air embolus postoperatively. The whole larynx was taken out, and specimens were embedded with colloidion and then serially sectioned. Dimension of excision and wound surface recovery status were observed.

RESULTS

All the operations on experiment animals were successful and the results were satisfactory. The excision dimension was the same as standard surgery. Gross specimens and serial sectioning staining of 5 dogs were performed. And the other 5 dogs wound surface had already recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

CO2 laser surgery was comparable with traditional vertical partial laryngectomy and supraglottic horizontal laryngectomy for excision size. Animals were able to survive the surgery, wound surface could recover spontaneously. It suggested the possibility of extended laryngectomy with laser.

Для цитирования: Huang Zhi-Gang, Han De-Min, Yu Zhen-Kun, Ni Xin, Chen Xiao-Hong. [Largest extension of CO2 laser surgery for laryngeal cancer in experimental animals].. Zhonghua er bi yan hou ke za zhi. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.