[Comparison between transoral microsurgery by CO2 laser and conventional surgical therapy for T2 glottic carcinoma].
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Transoral CO2 laser excision of early glottic cancer was first introduced in the 1970s. Since then it has become a serious alternative to surgery with conventional instruments.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
Between January 1987 and December 1997, 46 patients with T2 N0 M0 glottic carcinoma have been treated by either transoral laser microsurgery or fronto-lateral partial laryngeal resection with curative intention. Long-term results of both methods were compared after analysation of tumor-localization and recurrence-rate. Evaluation parameters were: incidence of local recurrence and incidence of death due to local recurrence. Other aspects of investigation were hospitalisation-time and treatment related patient morbidity.
RESULTS
Analysis of the data of our study shows that local recurrences were 5 % lower in cases of laser surgical tumor resection as opposed to conventional surgery (11 % vs. 16 %). If evaluated in accordance to localization of local recurrence in combination with primary tumor localization, results show that all three recurrent tumors in the group of laser resected patients had a primary in the anterior glottic area; two out of the three recurrences following fronto-lateral laryngeal resection were localized in the mid-third of the vocal cord. Hospital-admittance in laser-resected patients was shorter by one day when compared with the group of conventional surgery (10 vs. 11 days).
CONCLUSION
T2-Tumors of the anterior glottic area should preferably be approached by conventional surgery (external approach), particularly when endoscopical visualization is difficult. In contrast, T2-tumors of the medial and posterior glottic area should be resected endolaryngeally with the laser.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.