MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mhn.2003.65

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2003

Management of T3 N0 and T4 N0 glottic carcinomas: results of a national survey.

Greene Ryan M, Dewitt Adriane I, Otto Randal A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

A survey was undertaken to document the clinical management of T3 and T4 pure glottic primary carcinomas and the management of the N0 neck by otolaryngologists and radiation oncologists.

STUDY DESIGN AND

SETTING

This study represents the results of a national survey of 250 otolaryngologists and 250 radiation oncologists regarding management of T3 N0 M0 and T4 N0 M0 glottic carcinomas.

RESULTS

Of the surveys sent, 208 completed questionnaires were received. Results of this survey suggest that 87% and 90% will treat the neck for a T3 N0 M0 and T4 N0 M0 glottic tumor, respectively, with a large number choosing to perform a radical neck dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant percentage of otolaryngologists perform neck dissections in the management of T3 N0 M0 and T4 N0 M0 glottic carcinomas. Given the relatively low risk of occult metastasis, potentially high morbidity associated with overtreatment, and the lack of a well-designed outcome study investigating treatment alternatives, a prospective randomized study is needed to address the issue.

Для цитирования: Greene Ryan M, Dewitt Adriane I, Otto Randal A. Management of T3 N0 and T4 N0 glottic carcinomas: results of a national survey.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2003. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2003.65.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.