Introduction
Cardiac amyloidosis is a progressive myocardial disease with increasing incidence that ultimately leads to amyloid cardiomyopathy (CM), an important cause of heart failure [ 1 , 2 ]. Increased awareness of the disease is highlighted in the recent guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of CM [ 3 ]. The two main subtypes of CM are immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) and transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), which can be hereditary (hATTR) or wild-type (wtATTR) [ 4 ].
ATTR-CM and AL-CM differ in epidemiology, affection of additional organ systems, mean survival, and treatment options [ 5 – 8 ]. While therapeutic options for AL-CM include chemotherapy of the underlying disease (e.g., monoclonal gammopathy or multiple myeloma) [ 4 ], treatment of ATTR-CM was, for a long time, limited to supportive measures [ 6 ]. This changed with the approval of TTR stabilizer therapy and several other treatment options that are available for clinical use or in advanced clinical development [ 9 ]. ATTR-CM has a high prevalence and poor prognosis, with a median survival of only 3–5 years [ 7 ]. Recently approved treatment options have been shown to reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations, slow functional decline, and improve quality of life [ 6 ].
Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing ATTR-CM [ 2 , 9 ] but is an invasive procedure. Nuclear medicine imaging, including planar scintigraphy or cardiac single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using bone-avid tracers [ 10 – 14 ] or positron emission tomography (PET) using amyloid-specific tracers [ 15 – 19 ], are non-invasive techniques that can alternatively be performed to detect cardiac amyloid burden with high sensitivity and specificity.
Planar scintigraphy imaging and additional SPECT are simple and well-established procedures that have found their way into routine clinical practice for diagnosis of ATTR-CM [ 20 ]. Moreover, identification of additionally affected organ systems is possible [ 21 , 22 ]. In Europe, 99m Tc-diphosphono-propanodicarboxylic acid ( 99m Tc-DPD) or 99m Tc-hydroxymethylene-diphosphonate acid ( 99m Tc-HDP) are used as tracers for ATTR-CM detection [ 10 , 21 , 23 ]. In the US, these tracers are typically not available and instead, 99m Tc-pyrophosphate ( 99m Tc-PYP) is used for imaging of ATTR-CM [ 14 , 24 ]. All agents allow for diagnosis of ATTR-CM by visual evaluation, e.g., using the Perugini score [ 10 , 11 , 25 ], and while differentiation between ATTR-CM and AL-CM by qualitative/semi-quantitative comparisons of the cardiac tracer uptake in comparison to reference regions or quantitative SPECT imaging is more challenging [ 10 , 12 , 14 , 23 ].
Using 99m Tc-PYP, imaging is typically performed one hour after tracer injection [ 14 ], whereas using 99m Tc-DPD, the common interval between injection and imaging is 2–3 h [ 10 ]. A shorter interval of one hour increases patient comfort, allows more efficient scheduling, and facilitates timely diagnosis. This is of importance to meet the increasing demand for examinations.
The aim of this study was to compare early (one hour after injection) versus late (2.5–3 h after injection) 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy for detection of ATTR-CM. Furthermore, for both time points, (semi-)quantitative metrics from planar scintigraphy and SPECT imaging are additionally compared.
Methods
Study population & ethics approval
50 consecutive patients who were referred to our center for suspected ATTR-CM and subsequently received a confirmed diagnosis between February 2022 and February 2024 and willing to participate were included in this retrospective observational study. Referral and allocation were carried out by our cardiology and hematology specialties. Observational study was approved by the local institutional ethics board (Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen, 21-10243 BO) and written informed consent was requested.
Diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis
A review of clinical health records was performed for diagnosis of CM; this diagnosis was used as gold standard in the following evaluations. Diagnosis of ATTR-CM was validated by positive endomyocardial biopsy or on an imaging basis by fulfillment of the widely clinically accepted Gillmore criteria [ 11 ] requiring a positive bone scan (at least Perugini score 2) and absence of pointers of plasma cell disease.
Image acquisition
Injection of 99m Tc-DPD was performed after written informed consent for clinical examination. Scintigraphy and thoracic SPECT images were acquired 1 h and 2.5-3 h after tracer injection according to clinical protocol. CT images were used for attenuation correction and quantitative image reconstruction [ 26 ]. Images were acquired with either a Symbia Intevo or a Symbia T2 SPECT/CT system (both Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany).
Image evaluation
Different visual, quantitative, and semi-quantitative image evaluation metrics were applied:
(i) Visual evaluation of planar images: Cardiac tracer uptake on planar scintigraphy images was visually evaluated using the Perugini score [ 10 ]:
Grade 0: No cardiac uptake. Grade 1: Mild cardiac uptake, less than bone uptake. Grade 2: Moderate cardiac uptake, similar to bone uptake. Grade 3: Intense cardiac uptake, greater than bone uptake.
(ii) Semi-quantitative evaluation of planar images: Cardiac tracer uptake on planar scintigraphy images was semi-quantitatively evaluated by comparing count rates in a cardiac-centered region-of-interest (ROI) to count rates in specific reference region ROIs. For this purpose, the heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (HLR) from anterior whole body planar images was calculated, comparing the mean counts per pixel in the cardiac ROI to those in a contralateral lung ROI. Similarly, the heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR) was calculated, comparing the mean counts per pixel in the cardiac ROI to those in a mediastinal reference ROI.
(iii) Quantitative evaluation of SPECT images: Cardiac tracer uptake on quantitative SPECT images was assessed by determining the maximum standardized-uptake-value (SUV max ) in a cardiac-centered volume-of-interest (VOI). Quantitative image reconstruction and image evaluation were performed using a previously described method established at our center [ 26 ]. In brief, the whole heart was segmented and the SUV max value in the cardiac VOI was determined.
(iv) Semi-quantitative evaluation of SPECT images: For semi-quantitative evaluation of cardiac tracer uptake on SPECT images, data were normalized by blood pool and bone uptake [ 26 ]. To estimate blood pool and bone uptake, VOIs of 1 cm 3 volume were placed in a thoracal vertebral bone (that did not show any signs of degenerative changes) and the descending thoracal aorta [ 26 ]. The SUV max values in these VOIs were used to calculate the heart-to-vertebra ratio (HVR) and the heart-to-blood pool ratio (HBR) using the following definitions [ 26 ]:
Heart-to-vertebra ratio (HVR): SUV max cardiac / SUV max bone . Heart-to-blood pool ratio (HBR): SUV max cardiac / SUV max blood pool .
(V) Inter-observer validity.
For the analysis of inter-observer validity, the Perugini scores of the early and late imaging time points were evaluated independently by a total of 3 experienced board-certified nuclear medicine physicians in a blinded manner. In case of discrepant results, majority consensus read was obtained.
Validation
19 patients (male/female = 14 (74%)/5 (26%), mean age 78.1 years) with wtATTR-CM were scanned at the Medical University of Vienna at an early (1 h) and late (3 h) time point using a SPECT/CT system (Symbia Intevo, Siemens Medical Solutions AG, Erlangen Germany). Image analysis was performed using Hermes Hybrid 3D (Hermes Medical Solutions, Stockholm, Sweden). Perugini scores were determined according to clinical routine. Observational study was approved by the local institutional ethics board (EK769/2010). Each individual gave written informed consent prior to imaging. Findings were compared to the Essen cohort.
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests applied included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the visual Perugini grade between early and late images, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; two-way, mixed model) to compare semiquantitative and quantitative metrics between early and late images, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess diagnostic accuracy (applying Youden’s J statistic to derive optimal cut-off values). Differences in various semi-quantitative parameters between the ATTR-CM and non-CM groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. For the ICC, additionally 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. For all tests, P-values (P) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Fleiss’ kappa was calculated for evaluation of inter-observer validity including 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software in version 4.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 50 patients were included. Of these, 14 (28.0%) presented with ATTR-CM. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1 . Image examples of patients with and without ATTR-CM (at early and late imaging time points) are shown in Fig. 1 .
Table 1 Patient characteristics Characteristics Demographics Male/Female 34/16 Age (y) (mean ± SD) 78 ± 9 Weight (kg) (mean ± SD) 81.5 ± 17.9 Administered Activity (MBq) (mean ± SD) 648.7 ± 107.0 Perugini score (late time point) 0 36 (72%) 1 2 (4%) 2 5 (10%) 3 7 (14%) Perugini score (early time point) 0 25 (50%) 1 11 (22%) 2 3 (6%) 3 11 (22%) Diagnosis No ATTR-CM 36 (72 %) ATTR-CM 14 (28 %) NHYA Functional Class 0-I 5 (10.0%) II 14 (28.0%) III 29 (58.0%) IV 2 (4.0%)
Table 1
Patient characteristics
| Characteristics | |
| Demographics | |
| Male/Female | 34/16 |
| Age (y) (mean ± SD) | 78 ± 9 |
| Weight (kg) (mean ± SD) | 81.5 ± 17.9 |
| Administered Activity (MBq) (mean ± SD) | 648.7 ± 107.0 |
| Perugini score (late time point) | |
| 0 | 36 (72%) |
| 1 | 2 (4%) |
| 2 | 5 (10%) |
| 3 | 7 (14%) |
| Perugini score (early time point) | |
| 0 | 25 (50%) |
| 1 | 11 (22%) |
| 2 | 3 (6%) |
| 3 | 11 (22%) |
| Diagnosis | |
| No ATTR-CM | 36 (72 %) |
| ATTR-CM | 14 (28 %) |
| NHYA Functional Class | |
| 0-I | 5 (10.0%) |
| II | 14 (28.0%) |
| III | 29 (58.0%) |
| IV | 2 (4.0%) |
Fig. 1 Image examples. Planar scintigraphy images (early and late) from a patient without (left) and from a patient with ATTR-CM (right)

Perugini score
Median visual Perugini score was significantly higher for early imaging (0.5 vs. 0, p < 0.001). Detailed evaluation revealed a shift from Perugini 0 in late imaging to Perugini 1 in early imaging in 11 patients (22%). Two patients (4%) showed a shift from Perugini 1 in late imaging to Perugini 3 in early imaging. Both patients were diagnosed with biopsy-proven ATTR-CM (Fig. 2 ). Example images for shifted Perugini scores are displayed in Fig. 3 . Moreover, two patients (4%) showed a shift in Perugini score from 2 in late to 3 in early imaging.
Fig. 2 Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Visualization of Wilcoxon signed-rank test results comparing ordinal Perugini scores from early (1 h; green) and late (3 h; orange) imaging. Dashed lines connect paired scores from early to late imaging, illustrating within-patient changes; for example, patients graded as Perugini 2 showed no change between time points. Violin plots depict the distribution of scores, with embedded boxplots indicating the interquartile range. Large red circles mark the median score at each time point; the solid red line shows median change between early and late imaging

Fig. 3 Example of shifting Perugini scores between early and late imaging Planar scintigraphy and SPECT images (early and late) from one patient at time points 1 h and 3 h. Perugini score is shifting from 1 to 0 ( A ) and 3 to 1 ( B ), respectively

Quantitative and semi-quantitative uptake parameters
All (semi-)quantitative parameters derived from early and late planar and SPECT images were significantly higher in patients with ATTR-CM compared to patients without ATTR-CM (Table 2 ), indicating the potential of these metrics to differentiate patients with ATTR-CM.
Table 2 Different semi-quantitative parameters from planar and SPECT/CT images Parameter No ATTR-CM ATTR-CM P value Early imaging (median (IQR)) HMR 0.7 (0.6–0.8) 2.0 (1.4–2.6) < 0.001 HLR 1.3 (1.2–1.4) 2.3 (1.7–2.8) < 0.001 Cardiac SUV max 3.7 (3.0-4.1) 14.9 (12.9–18.8) < 0.001 HBR 1.5 (1.4–2.1) 6.7 (4.5–10.5) < 0.001 HVR 0.6 (0.4–0.7) 2.8 (2.3–3.4) < 0.001 Late imaging (median (IQR)) HMR 0.4 (0.3–0.5) 1.4 (1.0-2.1) < 0.001 HLR 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.8 (1.6–2.6) < 0.001 Cardiac SUV max 2.8 (2.1–3.9) 11.7 (9.4–17.2) < 0.001 HBR 1.8 (1.4–3.8) 4.8 (4.0-10.1) < 0.001 HVR 0.4 (0.2–0.6) 1.7 (1.3–2.1) < 0.001 CM = cardiac amyloidosis, ATTR = transthyretin, IQR = interquartile range, HMR = heart-to-mediastinum ratio; HLR = heart-to-contralateral-lung ratio, SUV = standardized uptake value, HBR = heart-to-blood-pool ratio, HVR = heart-to-vertebra ratio
Table 2
Different semi-quantitative parameters from planar and SPECT/CT images
CM = cardiac amyloidosis, ATTR = transthyretin, IQR = interquartile range, HMR = heart-to-mediastinum ratio; HLR = heart-to-contralateral-lung ratio, SUV = standardized uptake value, HBR = heart-to-blood-pool ratio, HVR = heart-to-vertebra ratio
| Parameter | No ATTR-CM | ATTR-CM | P value |
| Early imaging (median (IQR)) | |||
| HMR | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) | 2.0 (1.4–2.6) | < 0.001 |
| HLR | 1.3 (1.2–1.4) | 2.3 (1.7–2.8) | < 0.001 |
| Cardiac SUV max | 3.7 (3.0-4.1) | 14.9 (12.9–18.8) | < 0.001 |
| HBR | 1.5 (1.4–2.1) | 6.7 (4.5–10.5) | < 0.001 |
| HVR | 0.6 (0.4–0.7) | 2.8 (2.3–3.4) | < 0.001 |
| Late imaging (median (IQR)) | |||
| HMR | 0.4 (0.3–0.5) | 1.4 (1.0-2.1) | < 0.001 |
| HLR | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | 1.8 (1.6–2.6) | < 0.001 |
| Cardiac SUV max | 2.8 (2.1–3.9) | 11.7 (9.4–17.2) | < 0.001 |
| HBR | 1.8 (1.4–3.8) | 4.8 (4.0-10.1) | < 0.001 |
| HVR | 0.4 (0.2–0.6) | 1.7 (1.3–2.1) | < 0.001 |
Good to excellent correlation was observed between late and early time points with higher correlations for (semi-)quantitative parameters. ICC for Perugini grading was 0.85 ( p < 0.001). ICC for HMR, HLR, SUV max , HBR, HVR were 0.90 ( p < 0.05), 0.89 ( p < 0.001), 0.90 ( p < 0.001), 0.79 ( p < 0.001), 0.78 ( p < 0.001), respectively.
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC for diagnosis of ATTR-CM
All parameters showed high accuracy for diagnosing ATTR-CM (accuracy reaching from 0.80 to 1.0). The best performing metrics derived from planar scintigraphy and SPECT imaging were: Perugini score (late and early time point), HMR (early time point), SUV max (early time point), HCR (early time point). Detailed results, indicating also AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) are summarized in Table 3 .
Table 3 Different cut-off values derived from various semiquantitative analyses and their detection accuracy Parameter Cut-off Youden Index Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity AUC PPV NPV Early imaging HMR 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HLR 1.54 0.86 0.90 1.00 0.86 0.97 0.74 1.00 Cardiac SUV max 8.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HBR 3.82 0.90 0.96 0.93 0.97 0.96 0.93 0.97 HVR 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Late imaging HMR 0.85 0.93 0.98 0.93 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 HLR 1.35 0.80 0.92 0.86 0.94 0.92 0.86 0.94 Cardiac SUV max 7.05 0.94 0.96 1.00 0.94 0.99 0.87 1.00 HBR 3.96 0.63 0.80 0.86 0.78 0.87 0.60 0.93 HVR 0.78 0.86 0.90 1.00 0.86 0.97 0.74 1.00 HMR = heart-to-mediastinum ratio; HLR = heart-to-contralateral-lung ratio, SUV = standardized uptake value, HBR = heart-to-blood-pool ratio, HVR = heart-to-vertebra ratio
Table 3
Different cut-off values derived from various semiquantitative analyses and their detection accuracy
HMR = heart-to-mediastinum ratio; HLR = heart-to-contralateral-lung ratio, SUV = standardized uptake value, HBR = heart-to-blood-pool ratio, HVR = heart-to-vertebra ratio
| Parameter | Cut-off | Youden Index | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | AUC | PPV | NPV |
| Early imaging | ||||||||
| HMR | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| HLR | 1.54 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
| Cardiac SUV max | 8.55 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| HBR | 3.82 | 0.90 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| HVR | 1.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Late imaging | ||||||||
| HMR | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 |
| HLR | 1.35 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.94 |
| Cardiac SUV max | 7.05 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 1.00 |
| HBR | 3.96 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.60 | 0.93 |
| HVR | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
Inter-observer variability in late and early imaging of Perugini score
Early time point studies showed a higher inter-observer variability compared to late time point imaging (Fleiss’ kappa late: 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71–0.94), early: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.47–0.68). At early imaging, the blood pool activity remains relatively high compared to the 3-h time point (mean ± SD SUV max blood-pool 2.3 ± 0.98 vs. 1.73 ± 0.94), whereas bone activity increases from the early to the late time point (SUV max bone 0.43 ± 1.02 vs. 0.58 ± 1.07).
External validation
In the external validation cohort, the median visual grade was significantly higher at early imaging (3 vs. 2, p < 0.001). Detailed evaluation revealed a predominant downgrade from Perugini 3 at 1 h to Perugini 2 at late imaging in 10 patients (52.6%). The remaining patients had no change. No upward shifts were observed in this cohort (Table 4 ).
Table 4 External validation cohort Parameter Early imaging Late imaging Age (years), mean ± SD 78.1 ± 7.6 78.1 ± 7.6 Sex (M/F) 14 (74%) / 5 (26%) 14 (74%) / 5 (26%) n 19 19 Perugini (mean) 2.79 2.26 Perugini (minimum) 2 2 Perugini (maximum) 3 3 Perugini 0, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Perugini 1, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Perugini 2, n (%) 4 (21%) 14 (74%) Perugini 3, n (%) 15 (79%) 5 (26%) Shift early → late, n (%) Downgrade by 1: 10 (53%) Unchanged: 9 (47%); Upgrade: 0
Table 4
External validation cohort
| Parameter | Early imaging | Late imaging |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 78.1 ± 7.6 | 78.1 ± 7.6 |
| Sex (M/F) | 14 (74%) / 5 (26%) | 14 (74%) / 5 (26%) |
| n | 19 | 19 |
| Perugini (mean) | 2.79 | 2.26 |
| Perugini (minimum) | 2 | 2 |
| Perugini (maximum) | 3 | 3 |
| Perugini 0, n (%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Perugini 1, n (%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Perugini 2, n (%) | 4 (21%) | 14 (74%) |
| Perugini 3, n (%) | 15 (79%) | 5 (26%) |
| Shift early → late, n (%) | Downgrade by 1: 10 (53%) | Unchanged: 9 (47%); Upgrade: 0 |
Discussion
The study demonstrated an overall good agreement between early and late imaging for various cardiac uptake parameters. Visual interpretation (Perugini score) and (semi-)quantitative uptake values show up to perfect separation and accuracy for diagnosing ATTR-CM in the investigated patient cohort at both time points and no substantial difference between early and late imaging was observed (Table 3 ). This was also reflected by up to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients between both imaging time points.
Our results indicate that early imaging can be as reliable as late imaging for diagnosing CM. The high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity further support the feasibility of early imaging in clinical practice. Detailed analysis of Perugini score between early and late imaging showed systematically higher grades observed in early images (Fig. 2 ). Most change shifts were from Perugini 0 (late) to Perugini 1 (early) or from Perugini 2 (late) to Perugini 3 (early) (Fig. 2 ). These changes do not alter diagnosis of ATTR-CM but should be considered when interpreting early images, particularly if visual assessment alone is used: Perugini 1 cases were more abundant in early imaging (Table 1 ). Because cardiac uptake at 1 h post-injection is systematically more pronounced than at 3 h, established thresholds derived from late imaging – most importantly Perugini ≥ 2 for non-biopsy diagnosis of ATTR-CM in line with the Gillmore criteria – should not be transferred uncritically to the early time point. In the present cohort the same dichotomous threshold preserved diagnostic accuracy at both time points, but Perugini 1 was clearly more frequent at 1 h and should currently be regarded as an indication for additional late imaging rather than as positive evidence of disease. The higher residual blood-pool signal at early imaging likely reduces myocardial-to-background contrast (HBR 3.1 ± 6.3 vs. 3.7 ± 6.5), which may explain the decreased inter-observer variability in Perugini score interpretation. More specifically, residual blood-pool activity at 1 h reduces the visual contrast between the myocardium and surrounding background, while the still-rising bone uptake by the late time point provides a clearer reference against which the relative cardiac signal can be judged. As a consequence, mild cardiac uptake (Perugini 1) is more difficult to differentiate from absent uptake (Perugini 0) at 1 h than at 3 h, and a slightly higher proportion of equivocal interpretations is to be expected. In clinical practice this should be considered when relying on visual scoring alone; complementary use of (semi-)quantitative parameters – which in our cohort showed excellent inter-method agreement (ICC ≥ 0.78) and high diagnostic accuracy at 1 h – can support the visual read, particularly in borderline cases.
Only in two cases, Perugini scores switched from 3 in early imaging to 1 in late imaging. This led to the need for invasive diagnostics and in both patients ATTR-CM was proven by biopsy. Importantly, overall, the observed switches in Perugini grades had no impact on clinical diagnosis in this study, because no false-negative and false-positive result were observed. However, these results are yet limited by the sample size and the low number of Perugini 1 cases at late imaging which might require special attention.
Because of the good accuracy of the early imaging in differentiation between positive or negative diagnosis, most of the patients could be diagnosed at an early imaging time point. Due to shifts from 0 (late imaging) to 1 (early imaging) special attention must be paid to these patients. A practical approach can be to image only patients presenting with Perugini score 1 additionally at the later time point to reduce unnecessary invasive diagnostics. It has to be noted that, most likely due to the different blood pool activity, the inter-observer variability was higher in the early imaging group without affecting diagnostic accuracy.
The systematic elevation of early scores is likely attributable to tracer kinetics: At 1 h post-injection blood pool and myocardial activity are higher and later decreasing, whereas bone activity shows slower kinetics and is still increasing from the 1 h to the 3 h imaging time point. This behavior is well reflected by quantitative measurements in our cohort and earlier evaluation of the external validation cohort [ 27 ]. As the Perugini score visually compares myocardial to bone uptake, these processes explain higher Perugini grades at early imaging.
Compared with the initial cohort, the external validation results reinforce the observation that early imaging yields higher visual grades. However, the magnitude of change appears greater in the validation cohort, where nearly half of the patients exhibited a one-grade decrease, while the initial cohort showed a smaller proportion of downward shifts. Together, these findings validate the robustness of early imaging as a sensitive time point for detecting tracer uptake and strengthen the reproducibility of this effect across independent patient populations. Performing 99m Tc-DPD imaging at an earlier time point significantly enhances patient comfort by reducing the waiting period from 2.5 to 3 h to only 1 h. This benefit is particularly relevant for elderly patients and those with mobility limitations, for whom prolonged waiting can be burdensome. In addition, early imaging increases scheduling flexibility and allows clinics to examine more patients within the same timeframe - an important consideration given the rising demand for ATTR-CM diagnostics as awareness and referral rates continue to grow. In the context of increasing outpatient-based healthcare delivery, particularly in Germany and across the EU, a shorter imaging interval may also facilitate more efficient planning and resource allocation, thereby improving overall workflow in the outpatient sector. Comparable findings have been made for 99m Tc-PYP [ 28 , 29 ]. Imakhanova et al. [ 28 ] reported a high concordance between 1 h and 3 h ⁹⁹ᵐTc-PYP planar and SPECT/CT imaging in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis, with comparable sensitivity and specificity at both time points and a clear indication that the early protocol is sufficient for routine differentiation of ATTR-CM. Masri et al. [ 29 ] similarly demonstrated, in a larger clinical cohort, that an efficient 1 h ⁹⁹ᵐTc-PYP imaging protocol provides reliable diagnostic information for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis without compromising visual or H/CL ratio-based interpretation. Together, these studies support the feasibility of early imaging for ⁹⁹ᵐTc-PYP; our results extend this concept to ⁹⁹ᵐTc-DPD and confirm that the systematic upward shift in early visual grades, attributable to the differing kinetics of myocardial and bone uptake, does not impair overall diagnostic accuracy when combined with (semi-)quantitative parameters. One important advantage of the proposed approach is the substantial reduction in waiting time for approximately three-quarters of patients, as only about one-quarter would need to undergo delayed imaging. We acknowledge that this workflow adjustment may require organizational changes, particularly in the outpatient setting. However, we are confident that the improved schedulability for the majority of patients, with only a one-hour waiting period, would considerably ease the operational burden and enable a more predictable utilization of the gamma camera, even if the total number of examinations may slightly increase overall. Formal evaluation of the operational impact should be undertaken before the routine adoption of this targeted delayed-imaging approach. In the present cohort, only 4 of 50 patients (8%) presented with a Perugini score of 1 at the early time point, indicating that the additional delayed scan would be required in only a small minority of patients in routine practice. The proposed two-step workflow nevertheless requires prospective validation – ideally with a higher proportion of borderline cases – and a formal evaluation of its operational impact before broad clinical adoption.
In addition, early imaging may offer technical advantages: With the physical half-life of 99m Tc-DPD being 6 h, roughly 20% higher residual activity is expected at 1-hour post-injection. Thus, either a lower injected dose or a shorter acquisition time could be applied without compromising overall image quality. As myocardium shows an earlier peak uptake than bone tissue, there is an optimal time window after injection in which myocardial uptake has already reached a plateau, whereas bone uptake has not yet peaked—maximizing the contrast between heart and bone. This observation supports the notion that the Perugini score may require adjustment for early images, as the heart-to-bone ratio differs from that seen at later time points and further underscores the importance of integrating (semi-)quantitative parameters [ 30 ]. These considerations are supported by phantom measurements [ 31 ].
Beyond clinical routine, the results of this study may also facilitate international multicenter trials. Early imaging protocols combined with (semi-)quantitative approaches could provide standardized, reproducible imaging results across centers and regions, independent of tracer availability. The high diagnostic accuracy of these parameters emphasizes their potential for user-independent and harmonized assessment of ATTR-CM.
Limitations
A limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size in both cohorts, which, despite receiving data from two centers, restricts the generalizability of the findings. In addition, patient recruitment was performed within the context of clinical routine, which inherently introduces heterogeneity in referral patterns and diagnostic work-up. This also resulted in a comparatively low proportion of patients with confirmed ATTR-CM, which could limit the statistical power for subgroup analyses. Furthermore, only few borderline cases were included, limiting the evidence in patients with borderline results in Perugini scores.
Clinical perspective
This study demonstrates that early 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy offers reliable diagnostic accuracy comparable to late imaging. A practical approach can be to image only patients presenting with Perugini score 1 additionally at the later time point to reduce unnecessary invasive diagnostics. By reducing waiting time and improving scheduling capacity, early imaging protocols can optimize patient-centred care and support standardized, efficient diagnostic pathways for cardiac amyloidosis.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that early 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy provides diagnostic reliability comparable to conventional late imaging. The most immediate clinical benefit lies in improved patient comfort, particularly for elderly patients and those with mobility limitations, by reducing the waiting period from 2.5 to 3 h to 1 h. Confirmation in larger prospective cohorts with a higher proportion of borderline cases is warranted before early imaging can be broadly recommended for routine clinical practice.
Abbreviations
Amyloid cardiomyopathy
Transthyretin cardiomyopathy
Diphosphono-propanodicarboxylic acid
Single photon emission computed tomography
Maximum ctandardized uptake value
Heart-to-mediastinum ratio
Heart-to-lung ratio
Heart-to-vertebra ratio
Heart-to-blood pool ratio
Intraclass correlation coefficient
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Tugce Telli and David Kersting contributed equally.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by LK, NH, MP, CP, TW, JN, CS, ZV, WF, FB, FC, SL, TT and DK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by STS, TT and DK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This Research Work was funded by the Pfizer Junior Investigator Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) Research Program. S. Settelmeier and D. Kersting have received support from the German Research Foundation (UMEA Junior Clinician Scientist, UMEA Clinician Scientist Academy, FU356/12 − 2).
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Patients were enrolled in an observational study. Observational study was approved by the local institutional ethics board in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments (Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen, 21-10243 BO) and written informed consent was requested. For validation, observational study was approved by the local institutional ethics board (EK769/2010). Each individual gave written informed consent prior to imaging. Findings were compared to the Essen cohort. Each individual gave written informed consent to participate prior to imaging.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the participants for publication of this study and accompanying images.
Competing interests
C. P. Spielvogel declares speaker and consulting fees from Pfizer. All other authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest regarding this work.C. Rischpler, K. Herrmann and M. Hacker are editors of this journal.S. Settelmeier: received speaker honoraria from Astra Zeneca outside of the submitted work.A. Carpinteiro: Personal fees outside the submitted work for consulting and/or lectures from Alexion, Alnylam, Amgen, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi and Takeda and travel and congress participation grants from Janssen.M. Papathanasiou has received speaker and consultancy fees from Cytokinetics, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Alnylam, Bayer, Alexion, Prothena, Janssen, Zoll, and Novo Nordisk, has participated in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Alnylam, and Cytokinetics and received research grants from Alnylam.C. Rischpler: Personal fees outside the submitted work for speaker honoraria (Alnylam, Bayer, Curium, GE Healthcare, Novartis, Pfizer, Rotop, Siemens Healthineers) and for consultancy (Pfizer, Novartis).T. Rassaf: Personal fees outside the submitted work from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca and Pfizer. Research funding: German Research Foundation (DFG; RA 969/12 − 1). Co-Founder of Mycor GmbH, a company focusing on artificial intelligence-based electrocardiography algorithms or the detection of amyloidosis [ 32 ]. Co-founder of Bimyo GmbH, a company that develops cardioprotective peptides.L. Michel: Personal fees outside the submitted work from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, IFFM e. V. and from Bund der Niedergelassenen Kardiologen (BNK). Research funding: UME funding from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and Bayer for an investigator/institution sponsored collaborative study outside the submitted work. S.O. received travel and congress participation grants from Janssen and Alexion.M. Hacker and C. P. Spielvogel are members of the editorial board of the Journal.
References
1. Garcia-Pavia P Rapezzi C Adler Y Arad M Basso C Brucato A Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases Eur Heart J 2021 42 1554 68 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072 33825853 PMC8060056 Garcia-Pavia P, Rapezzi C, Adler Y, Arad M, Basso C, Brucato A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1554–68. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072. 33825853 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072 PMC8060056
2. Writing C Kittleson MM Ruberg FL Ambardekar AV Brannagan TH Cheng RK 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Care for the Patient With Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee J Am Coll Cardiol 2023 81 1076 126 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.022 36697326 Writing C, Kittleson MM, Ruberg FL, Ambardekar AV, Brannagan TH, Cheng RK, et al. 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Care for the Patient With Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:1076–126. 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.022. 36697326 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.022
3. Arbelo E Protonotarios A Gimeno JR Arbustini E Barriales-Villa R Basso C 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies Eur Heart J 2023 44 3503 626 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194 37622657 Arbelo E, Protonotarios A, Gimeno JR, Arbustini E, Barriales-Villa R, Basso C, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–626. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194. 37622657 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
4. Seferovic PM Polovina M Bauersachs J Arad M Ben Gal T Lund LH Heart failure in cardiomyopathies: a position paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Eur J Heart Fail 2019 21 553 76 10.1002/ejhf.1461 30989768 Seferovic PM, Polovina M, Bauersachs J, Arad M, Ben Gal T, Lund LH, et al. Heart failure in cardiomyopathies: a position paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21:553–76. 10.1002/ejhf.1461. 30989768 10.1002/ejhf.1461
5. Maurer MS Hanna M Grogan M Dispenzieri A Witteles R Drachman B Genotype and Phenotype of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: THAOS (Transthyretin Amyloid Outcome Survey) J Am Coll Cardiol 2016 68 161 72 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.596 27386769 PMC4940135 Maurer MS, Hanna M, Grogan M, Dispenzieri A, Witteles R, Drachman B, et al. Genotype and Phenotype of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: THAOS (Transthyretin Amyloid Outcome Survey). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:161–72. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.596. 27386769 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.596 PMC4940135
6. Maurer MS Schwartz JH Gundapaneni B Elliott PM Merlini G Waddington-Cruz M Tafamidis Treatment for Patients with Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 2018 379 1007 16 10.1056/NEJMoa1805689 30145929 Maurer MS, Schwartz JH, Gundapaneni B, Elliott PM, Merlini G, Waddington-Cruz M, et al. Tafamidis Treatment for Patients with Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1007–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa1805689. 30145929 10.1056/NEJMoa1805689
7. Grogan M Scott CG Kyle RA Zeldenrust SR Gertz MA Lin G Natural History of Wild-Type Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Risk Stratification Using a Novel Staging System J Am Coll Cardiol 2016 68 1014 20 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.033 27585505 Grogan M, Scott CG, Kyle RA, Zeldenrust SR, Gertz MA, Lin G, et al. Natural History of Wild-Type Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Risk Stratification Using a Novel Staging System. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1014–20. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.033. 27585505 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.033
8. Palladini G Sachchithanantham S Milani P Gillmore J Foli A Lachmann H A European collaborative study of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in upfront treatment of systemic AL amyloidosis Blood 2015 126 612 5 10.1182/blood-2015-01-620302 25987656 Palladini G, Sachchithanantham S, Milani P, Gillmore J, Foli A, Lachmann H, et al. A European collaborative study of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in upfront treatment of systemic AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2015;126:612–5. 10.1182/blood-2015-01-620302. 25987656 10.1182/blood-2015-01-620302
9. Gonzalez-Lopez E Maurer MS Garcia-Pavia P Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: a paradigm for advancing precision medicine Eur Heart J 2025 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae811 39791537 PMC11905746 Gonzalez-Lopez E, Maurer MS, Garcia-Pavia P. Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: a paradigm for advancing precision medicine. Eur Heart J. 2025. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae811. 39791537 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae811 PMC11905746
10. Perugini E Guidalotti PL Salvi F Cooke RM Pettinato C Riva L Noninvasive etiologic diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis using 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 46 1076 84 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.073 16168294 Perugini E, Guidalotti PL, Salvi F, Cooke RM, Pettinato C, Riva L, et al. Noninvasive etiologic diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis using 99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1076–84. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.073. 16168294 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.073
11. Gillmore JD Maurer MS Falk RH Merlini G Damy T Dispenzieri A Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis Circulation 2016 133 2404 12 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021612 27143678 Gillmore JD, Maurer MS, Falk RH, Merlini G, Damy T, Dispenzieri A, et al. Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis. Circulation. 2016;133:2404–12. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021612. 27143678 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021612
12. Gallini C Tutino F Martone R Ciaccio A Costanzo EN Taborchi G Semi-quantitative indices of cardiac uptake in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis undergoing 99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy J Nucl Cardiol 2021 28 90 9 10.1007/s12350-019-01643-w 30767162 Gallini C, Tutino F, Martone R, Ciaccio A, Costanzo EN, Taborchi G, et al. Semi-quantitative indices of cardiac uptake in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis undergoing 99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28:90–9. 10.1007/s12350-019-01643-w. 30767162 10.1007/s12350-019-01643-w
13. Caobelli F Braun M Haaf P Wild D Zellweger MJ Quantitative (99m)Tc-DPD SPECT/CT in patients with suspected ATTR cardiac amyloidosis: Feasibility and correlation with visual scores J Nucl Cardiol 2020 27 1456 63 10.1007/s12350-019-01893-8 31538322 Caobelli F, Braun M, Haaf P, Wild D, Zellweger MJ. Quantitative (99m)Tc-DPD SPECT/CT in patients with suspected ATTR cardiac amyloidosis: Feasibility and correlation with visual scores. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020;27:1456–63. 10.1007/s12350-019-01893-8. 31538322 10.1007/s12350-019-01893-8
14. Bokhari S Castano A Pozniakoff T Deslisle S Latif F Maurer MS 99m)Tc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy for differentiating light-chain cardiac amyloidosis from the transthyretin-related familial and senile cardiac amyloidoses Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013 6 195 201 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000132 23400849 PMC3727049 Bokhari S, Castano A, Pozniakoff T, Deslisle S, Latif F, Maurer MS. (99m)Tc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy for differentiating light-chain cardiac amyloidosis from the transthyretin-related familial and senile cardiac amyloidoses. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:195–201. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000132. 23400849 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000132 PMC3727049
15. Dorbala S Vangala D Semer J Strader C Bruyere JR Jr Di Carli MF Imaging cardiac amyloidosis: a pilot study using (1)(8)F-florbetapir positron emission tomography Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014 41 1652 62 10.1007/s00259-014-2787-6 24841414 Dorbala S, Vangala D, Semer J, Strader C, Bruyere JR Jr., Di Carli MF, et al. Imaging cardiac amyloidosis: a pilot study using (1)(8)F-florbetapir positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1652–62. 10.1007/s00259-014-2787-6. 24841414 10.1007/s00259-014-2787-6
16. Kircher M Ihne S Brumberg J Morbach C Knop S Kortüm KM Detection of cardiac amyloidosis with (18)F-Florbetaben-PET/CT in comparison to echocardiography, cardiac MRI and DPD-scintigraphy Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019 46 1407 16 10.1007/s00259-019-04290-y 30798427 Kircher M, Ihne S, Brumberg J, Morbach C, Knop S, Kortüm KM, et al. Detection of cardiac amyloidosis with (18)F-Florbetaben-PET/CT in comparison to echocardiography, cardiac MRI and DPD-scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1407–16. 10.1007/s00259-019-04290-y. 30798427 10.1007/s00259-019-04290-y
17. Dietemann S Nkoulou R Amyloid PET imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: a pilot study using (18)F-flutemetamol positron emission tomography Ann Nucl Med 2019 33 624 8 10.1007/s12149-019-01372-7 31140154 Dietemann S, Nkoulou R. Amyloid PET imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: a pilot study using (18)F-flutemetamol positron emission tomography. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33:624–8. 10.1007/s12149-019-01372-7. 31140154 10.1007/s12149-019-01372-7
18. Wagner T Page J Burniston M Skillen A Ross JC Manwani R Extracardiac (18)F-florbetapir imaging in patients with systemic amyloidosis: more than hearts and minds Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018 45 1129 38 10.1007/s00259-018-3995-2 29651545 PMC5953997 Wagner T, Page J, Burniston M, Skillen A, Ross JC, Manwani R, et al. Extracardiac (18)F-florbetapir imaging in patients with systemic amyloidosis: more than hearts and minds. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1129–38. 10.1007/s00259-018-3995-2. 29651545 10.1007/s00259-018-3995-2 PMC5953997
19. Kim YJ Ha S Kim YI Cardiac amyloidosis imaging with amyloid positron emission tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis J Nucl Cardiol 2020 27 123 32 10.1007/s12350-018-1365-x 30022405 Kim YJ, Ha S, Kim YI. Cardiac amyloidosis imaging with amyloid positron emission tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020;27:123–32. 10.1007/s12350-018-1365-x. 30022405 10.1007/s12350-018-1365-x
20. Dorbala S Ando Y Bokhari S Dispenzieri A Falk RH Ferrari VA ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA /ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging J Card Fail 2019 25 e1 39 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.08.001 31473268 Dorbala S, Ando Y, Bokhari S, Dispenzieri A, Falk RH, Ferrari VA, ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA, et al. /ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging. J Card Fail. 2019;25:e1–39. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.08.001. 31473268 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.08.001
21. Hutt DF Quigley AM Page J Hall ML Burniston M Gopaul D Utility and limitations of 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy in systemic amyloidosis Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014 15 1289 98 10.1093/ehjci/jeu107 24939945 Hutt DF, Quigley AM, Page J, Hall ML, Burniston M, Gopaul D, et al. Utility and limitations of 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy in systemic amyloidosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15:1289–98. 10.1093/ehjci/jeu107. 24939945 10.1093/ehjci/jeu107
22. Cappelli F Gallini C Costanzo EN Tutino F Ciaccio A Vaggelli L Lung uptake during 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in patient with TTR cardiac amyloidosis: An underestimated phenomenon Int J Cardiol 2018 254 346 50 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.027 29407121 Cappelli F, Gallini C, Costanzo EN, Tutino F, Ciaccio A, Vaggelli L, et al. Lung uptake during 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in patient with TTR cardiac amyloidosis: An underestimated phenomenon. Int J Cardiol. 2018;254:346–50. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.027. 29407121 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.027
23. Cappelli F Gallini C Di Mario C Costanzo EN Vaggelli L Tutino F Accuracy of 99mTc-Hydroxymethylene diphosphonate scintigraphy for diagnosis of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis J Nucl Cardiol 2019 26 497 504 10.1007/s12350-017-0922-z 28537040 Cappelli F, Gallini C, Di Mario C, Costanzo EN, Vaggelli L, Tutino F, et al. Accuracy of 99mTc-Hydroxymethylene diphosphonate scintigraphy for diagnosis of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26:497–504. 10.1007/s12350-017-0922-z. 28537040 10.1007/s12350-017-0922-z
24. Ren C Ren J Tian Z Du Y Hao Z Zhang Z Assessment of cardiac amyloidosis with (99m)Tc-pyrophosphate (PYP) quantitative SPECT EJNMMI Phys 2021 8 3 10.1186/s40658-020-00342-7 33411102 PMC7790978 Ren C, Ren J, Tian Z, Du Y, Hao Z, Zhang Z, et al. Assessment of cardiac amyloidosis with (99m)Tc-pyrophosphate (PYP) quantitative SPECT. EJNMMI Phys. 2021;8:3. 10.1186/s40658-020-00342-7. 33411102 10.1186/s40658-020-00342-7 PMC7790978
25. Cappelli F Gallini C Perfetto F PYP or DPD and HDP for cardiac amyloidosis one for all, all for one J Nucl Cardiol 2020 27 1041 2 10.1007/s12350-019-01728-6 31044407 Cappelli F, Gallini C, Perfetto F. PYP or DPD and HDP for cardiac amyloidosis one for all, all for one. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020;27:1041–2. 10.1007/s12350-019-01728-6. 31044407 10.1007/s12350-019-01728-6
26. Kessler L Fragoso Costa P Kersting D Jentzen W Weber M Ludike P Quantitative (99m)Tc-DPD-SPECT/CT assessment of cardiac amyloidosis J Nucl Cardiol 2023 30 101 11 10.1007/s12350-022-02960-3 35562639 PMC9984322 Kessler L, Fragoso Costa P, Kersting D, Jentzen W, Weber M, Ludike P, et al. Quantitative (99m)Tc-DPD-SPECT/CT assessment of cardiac amyloidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023;30:101–11. 10.1007/s12350-022-02960-3. 35562639 10.1007/s12350-022-02960-3 PMC9984322
27. Wollenweber T Rettl R Kretschmer-Chott E Rasul S Kulterer OC Kluge K Cardiac DPD-uptake time dependency in ATTR patients verified by quantitative SPECT/CT and semiquantitative planar parameters J Nuclear Cardiol 2023 30 1363 71 10.1007/s12350-022-03149-4 PMC10371940 36513919 Wollenweber T, Rettl R, Kretschmer-Chott E, Rasul S, Kulterer OC, Kluge K, et al. Cardiac DPD-uptake time dependency in ATTR patients verified by quantitative SPECT/CT and semiquantitative planar parameters. J Nuclear Cardiol. 2023;30:1363–71. 10.1007/s12350-022-03149-4. 10.1007/s12350-022-03149-4 PMC10371940 36513919
28. Imakhanova A Ideguchi R Kawano H Maemura K Kudo T Optimizing cardiac amyloidosis assessment: utility of 1-h and 3-h 99mTc-PYP imaging Eur J Med Res 2024 29 32 10.1186/s40001-023-01629-y 38184638 PMC10770959 Imakhanova A, Ideguchi R, Kawano H, Maemura K, Kudo T. Optimizing cardiac amyloidosis assessment: utility of 1-h and 3-h 99mTc-PYP imaging. Eur J Med Res. 2024;29:32. 10.1186/s40001-023-01629-y. 38184638 10.1186/s40001-023-01629-y PMC10770959
29. Masri A Bukhari S Ahmad S Nieves R Eisele YS Follansbee W Efficient 1-Hour Technetium-99 m Pyrophosphate Imaging Protocol for the Diagnosis of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2020 13 e010249 10.1161/circimaging.119.010249 32063053 PMC7032611 Masri A, Bukhari S, Ahmad S, Nieves R, Eisele YS, Follansbee W, et al. Efficient 1-Hour Technetium-99 m Pyrophosphate Imaging Protocol for the Diagnosis of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:e010249. 10.1161/circimaging.119.010249. 32063053 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010249 PMC7032611
30. Wollenweber T Rettl R Kretschmer-Chott E Rasul S Kulterer OC Kluge K Cardiac DPD-uptake time dependency in ATTR patients verified by quantitative SPECT/CT and semiquantitative planar parameters J Nucl Cardiol 2023 30 1363 71 10.1007/s12350-022-03149-4 36513919 PMC10371940 Wollenweber T, Rettl R, Kretschmer-Chott E, Rasul S, Kulterer OC, Kluge K, et al. Cardiac DPD-uptake time dependency in ATTR patients verified by quantitative SPECT/CT and semiquantitative planar parameters. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023;30:1363–71. 10.1007/s12350-022-03149-4. 36513919 10.1007/s12350-022-03149-4 PMC10371940
31. Schatka I Bingel A Schau F Bluemel S Messroghli DR Frumkin D An optimized imaging protocol for [(99m)Tc]Tc-DPD scintigraphy and SPECT/CT quantification in cardiac transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis J Nucl Cardiol 2021 28 2483 96 10.1007/s12350-021-02715-6 34331215 PMC8709821 Schatka I, Bingel A, Schau F, Bluemel S, Messroghli DR, Frumkin D, et al. An optimized imaging protocol for [(99m)Tc]Tc-DPD scintigraphy and SPECT/CT quantification in cardiac transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28:2483–96. 10.1007/s12350-021-02715-6. 34331215 10.1007/s12350-021-02715-6 PMC8709821
32. Mahabadi AA Knobeloch J Backmann V Michel L Anker MS Wakili R Novel three-dimensional ECG algorithm for reliable screening for cardiac amyloidosis ESC Heart Fail 2025 12 2993 3002 10.1002/ehf2.15318 40320390 PMC12287817 Mahabadi AA, Knobeloch J, Backmann V, Michel L, Anker MS, Wakili R, et al. Novel three-dimensional ECG algorithm for reliable screening for cardiac amyloidosis. ESC Heart Fail. 2025;12:2993–3002. 10.1002/ehf2.15318. 40320390 10.1002/ehf2.15318 PMC12287817