Journal of endodontics · 2024
Pericervical Dentin Metrics in Mandibular First Molars Determined with Digital Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boveda Carlos, Kishen Anil, Millan Beatriz, Camejo María V, Gomez-Sosa Jose Francisco
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Pericervical root dentin is decisive for the long-term mechanical integrity of root-filled teeth. Current treatment protocol does not include a customized step to determine the pretreatment residual pericervical root dentin.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the residual root dentin and canal width using digital periapical radiography (DPR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the apical limit of the pericervical area (PCA) in mandibular first molars.
METHODS: DPR and CBCT images of 60 patients with age between 22 and 76 years were used to determine (a) the mesiodistal widths of the root canal (pericervical dimensions [PCL]-C) and the root (PCL-R) of mandibular first molars at the apical limit of the PCA and (b) the intracanal distance from the apical limit of the PCA to the radiographic apex (intracanal distance [ICD]). The correlation between the PCL and ICD measurements obtained from DPR and CBCT were evaluated.
RESULTS: Values between 0.10-0.80 mm and 0.00-1.10 mm were obtained for PCL-C using DPR and CBCT respectively (95% CI). The PCL values between 0.90-2.30 mm and 0.00-2.30 mm were obtained from DPR and CBCT respectively (95% CI). The ICD ranged between 4.6-12.3 mm in DPR and 4.40-12.0 mm in CBCT (95% CI). The comparative analysis showed differences from -0.9 to 0.5 mms for PCL and -2.00 to 1.5 mms for ICD between DPR and CBCT techniques respectively.
CONCLUSION: The PCL and ICD determined from DPR and CBCT provided the pericervical dentin metrics that could be utilized clinically as a guideline for decision-making in endodontic treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the residual root dentin and canal width using digital periapical radiography (DPR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the apical limit of the pericervical area (PCA) in mandibular first molars.
METHODS: DPR and CBCT images of 60 patients with age between 22 and 76 years were used to determine (a) the mesiodistal widths of the root canal (pericervical dimensions [PCL]-C) and the root (PCL-R) of mandibular first molars at the apical limit of the PCA and (b) the intracanal distance from the apical limit of the PCA to the radiographic apex (intracanal distance [ICD]). The correlation between the PCL and ICD measurements obtained from DPR and CBCT were evaluated.
RESULTS: Values between 0.10-0.80 mm and 0.00-1.10 mm were obtained for PCL-C using DPR and CBCT respectively (95% CI). The PCL values between 0.90-2.30 mm and 0.00-2.30 mm were obtained from DPR and CBCT respectively (95% CI). The ICD ranged between 4.6-12.3 mm in DPR and 4.40-12.0 mm in CBCT (95% CI). The comparative analysis showed differences from -0.9 to 0.5 mms for PCL and -2.00 to 1.5 mms for ICD between DPR and CBCT techniques respectively.
CONCLUSION: The PCL and ICD determined from DPR and CBCT provided the pericervical dentin metrics that could be utilized clinically as a guideline for decision-making in endodontic treatment.