Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2015
Estimation of bony orbit depth for optimal selection of the injection technique to correct the tear trough and palpebromalar groove.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El-Garem Yehia Farouk
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Different techniques have been used for filler injection of the tear trough and palpebromalar groove. Most patients report good results; however, some patients here experienced variable degrees of side effects.
OBJECTIVE: To assess if previous estimation of the bony orbit depth could affect the choice between bolus and serial puncture technique, and thereby the procedure outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 32 patients, the periosteum depth was measured by using a 28 G needle at 2 points: Point A at the midpupillary line and Point B at the outer canthus. The bolus technique was performed in the right side, and serial puncture technique was done on the left side.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the degree of improvement between both sides in 71% of patients: 40% had better improvement on the right side, whereas 31% had better improvement on the left side. Cases with skin-to-periosteum depth less than 0.5 cm showed better results with serial puncture technique, whereas those with more than 0.5 cm depth showed better results with bolus technique.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of bony orbit depth could offer new tool for selecting infraorbital groove injection technique.
OBJECTIVE: To assess if previous estimation of the bony orbit depth could affect the choice between bolus and serial puncture technique, and thereby the procedure outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 32 patients, the periosteum depth was measured by using a 28 G needle at 2 points: Point A at the midpupillary line and Point B at the outer canthus. The bolus technique was performed in the right side, and serial puncture technique was done on the left side.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the degree of improvement between both sides in 71% of patients: 40% had better improvement on the right side, whereas 31% had better improvement on the left side. Cases with skin-to-periosteum depth less than 0.5 cm showed better results with serial puncture technique, whereas those with more than 0.5 cm depth showed better results with bolus technique.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of bony orbit depth could offer new tool for selecting infraorbital groove injection technique.