Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2021
Pelvic Floor Organ Prolapse After Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Uroepithelial Carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lipetskaia Lioudmila, Lee Toy Gee, Li Dongmei, Meyer Haley, Doyle Paula Jaye, Messing Edward
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify whether women who undergo a radical cystectomy for uroepithelial carcinoma are at increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse after surgical treatment.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared female subjects who had undergone a radical cystectomy for uroepithelial carcinoma, as identified through an institutional cancer survivor database, with subjects who presented to the Pelvic Health and Continence Clinic with symptoms of either uterovaginal prolapse or urinary incontinence. Demographic data were collected regarding risk factors for prolapse, and study subjects were asked to complete a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6). Data were collected through retrospective chart review. The primary outcome is difference in the POPDI-6 between the groups. Statistical evaluation of responses was performed, with analysis of variance used to compare the questionnaire scores between groups and correction for risk factors with χ2 tests, with a P value of 0.05 selected for statistical significance.
RESULTS: There were 36 postcystectomy subjects who responded to the survey, 37 subjects in the prolapse group, and 44 subjects in the incontinence group. With correction for age, body mass index, and number of vaginal deliveries, the postcystectomy group reported significantly lower scores on the POPDI-6 than both the prolapse group (P < 0.0001) and the incontinence group (P = 0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: Radical cystectomy for uroepithelial carcinoma does not correlate with an increased risk of patient-reported symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared female subjects who had undergone a radical cystectomy for uroepithelial carcinoma, as identified through an institutional cancer survivor database, with subjects who presented to the Pelvic Health and Continence Clinic with symptoms of either uterovaginal prolapse or urinary incontinence. Demographic data were collected regarding risk factors for prolapse, and study subjects were asked to complete a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6). Data were collected through retrospective chart review. The primary outcome is difference in the POPDI-6 between the groups. Statistical evaluation of responses was performed, with analysis of variance used to compare the questionnaire scores between groups and correction for risk factors with χ2 tests, with a P value of 0.05 selected for statistical significance.
RESULTS: There were 36 postcystectomy subjects who responded to the survey, 37 subjects in the prolapse group, and 44 subjects in the incontinence group. With correction for age, body mass index, and number of vaginal deliveries, the postcystectomy group reported significantly lower scores on the POPDI-6 than both the prolapse group (P < 0.0001) and the incontinence group (P = 0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: Radical cystectomy for uroepithelial carcinoma does not correlate with an increased risk of patient-reported symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse.