Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2008
[18F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography roles in thymic lesion treatment planning.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Travaini Laura L, Petralia Giuseppe, Trifirò Giuseppe, Ravasi Laura, Galetta Domenico, Carbone Giuseppe, Falcini Fabio, Spaggiari Lorenzo, Bellomi Massimo, Paganelli Giovanni
Аннотация
RATIONALE: Thymic masses may represent an unsolved diagnostic problem which often require surgical procedures for an accurate staging. A non-invasive way to determine the nature of thymic lesions would help identify the patients which are true candidates for surgery. Our retrospective study aims to assess multidetector computed tomography and 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET/CT) capacity to distinguish benign from malignant thymic lesions.
METHODS: Helical multidetector CT (MDCT) and [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT of twenty consecutive patients presenting with a thymic mass at our Institute were retrospectively analyzed. MDCT scans were focused on morphologic features and invasiveness characteristics. Qualitative and semi-quantitative analyses by maximum standardized uptake value corrected for body weight (SUVbw max) were performed on [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT. In all cases, readers were blinded to pathology findings. Both imaging techniques were correlated to final pathology. Student's t-test was performed on SUVbw max stratified for thymic epithelial tumors.
RESULTS: In the group of benign lesions MDCT correctly identified well-defined margins of masses in 8 out of 8 patients whereas [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT was negative in 7 out of 8 patients. Among malignant lesions MDCT revealed mediastinum fat or infiltration of adjacent organs in 10/12 patients. On the other hand [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT showed increased radiotracer uptake in 12/12 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: MDCT and [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT alone are not able to differentiate the nature of thymic lesions. However, they are two non-invasive complementary techniques which can be used to differentiate benign from high-risk malignant thymic lesions. These findings should be taken into account before surgery is performed as a diagnostic procedure.
METHODS: Helical multidetector CT (MDCT) and [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT of twenty consecutive patients presenting with a thymic mass at our Institute were retrospectively analyzed. MDCT scans were focused on morphologic features and invasiveness characteristics. Qualitative and semi-quantitative analyses by maximum standardized uptake value corrected for body weight (SUVbw max) were performed on [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT. In all cases, readers were blinded to pathology findings. Both imaging techniques were correlated to final pathology. Student's t-test was performed on SUVbw max stratified for thymic epithelial tumors.
RESULTS: In the group of benign lesions MDCT correctly identified well-defined margins of masses in 8 out of 8 patients whereas [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT was negative in 7 out of 8 patients. Among malignant lesions MDCT revealed mediastinum fat or infiltration of adjacent organs in 10/12 patients. On the other hand [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT showed increased radiotracer uptake in 12/12 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: MDCT and [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT alone are not able to differentiate the nature of thymic lesions. However, they are two non-invasive complementary techniques which can be used to differentiate benign from high-risk malignant thymic lesions. These findings should be taken into account before surgery is performed as a diagnostic procedure.